Robyklebt wrote: ↑Wed Oct 24, 2018 10:28 am
Donks doesn't think the "GC factor" needs to be constant/symmetrical.
Start at 0.8 to me seemed better.
Can be 0.8-0.9-1.0-1.05-1.1
Or even 0.8-0.9-1.0-1.1-1.1, as I said the cat 5 tours get their money from the length... So Abit a special case. He cat 4 ones on the other hand can be part of the constant increase, since their length is 7 to 9 days (or maybe even 6-9?). Anyway comparable to many cat 1-3 tours. So there up to 1.1 somehow seems ok.
Donkey, either you just enjoy negotiating too much OR you have a really bad memory OR you want to prevent the change that you initiated yourself!
So let's do a quick recap for everyone!
The original Donkeyposal was 0.6-0.8-1.0-1.2-1.4. Constant & symmetrical & more extreme than anything anybody else suggested! Gipfel thought was too extreme, so suggested 0.8-0.9-1.0-1.1-1.2. Constant & symmetrical. Then, Liquigas thought was too extreme, so suggested 0.8-0.9-1.0-1.08-1.14. Not constant & not symmetrical.
Donkey agreed!
"GC sounds ok"
But less than 1 month later, Donkey disagreed!
1.14 to me is still to high. We could even stay at 1.0 really, but ok, more important so more. 1.1 max IMO. Cat 4 then either 1.05 or can be 1.1 too.
OK, so Gipfel is really friendly and makes another compromise. Make it less extreme, but stay constant & symmetrical with 0.9-0.95-1.0-1.05-1.1.
So Donkey comes around the corner, suddenly doesn't want constant & symmetrical anymore! Why now suddenly? No reason. So either you just enjoy negotiating too much OR you have a really bad memory OR you want to prevent the change that you initiated yourself!
But let me explain why i think an equal distribution makes sense:
1. It's simple.
2. It's intuitive. Take cat.3 as the base case like it is today. Adjust around that.
3. No big change in total prize money in RSF. Because this is not about increase or decrease money. it is about distribution of money.