luques wrote: ↑Sat May 26, 2018 11:49 am
So I would say, Occitanie out.
Dauphine 14-18-20-23
Tour de Suisse 9-15-21-24
Slovenia 10 - 19 - 22
Adriatica 10-15-18-22
Savoie 12 - 19 - 23 (really not sure about this)
So French guys will have Dauphiné one hour earlier, still having the midnight edition for Suisse. 22h will have all the month covered, Luxembourg - Slovenia and Adriatica.
Suisse has the morning edition, considered there were more requests than Dauphiné. Savoie introduced in parallel with Adriatica.
I guess for TdF times we can make a poll later, not against 22h anyway, giving Vuelta maybe the 24h spot (or 23 again).
Let's see if someone is happy
Someone happy? Probably you'll find someone. But unhappy people here as well. In my case unhappiness is chronic.
Dauphiné-TdS Donks ok.
Slovenia 3... not fully convinced, I would have preferred 2+2 including Occitanie, just one edition more, but we ride one more real race. While I'm not as fanatic about riding all real races as somebody else here, I agree in principle that riding as many as possible sounds nice. Here to me 4 parallel editions to the 4 TdS editions seemed doable, but won't start a revolution over it. Slovenia times though good. If all are ok with this, ok for me too.
Then SAvoie... I'm really not a big fun of adding a 2.2 race when we leave out x more important ones. Just because it's "nice", mountainous doesn't really need to be ridden. But ok, if it already has been designed... bah. 3 editions, seems one too many too really, but ok, again, won't start a revolution over it, just think it's a bit unfortunate to have that in. We don't always need parallel stuff, but when there is, 2.1. stuff, but not even there all, having it good. Of course cat 1 for this. (How is the money thing coming?)