IN this thread,
viewtopic.php?f=34&t=10387 where the opening post was sanctioned, 100k (I thought 50 at first reading, but seems 100k, amazing stuff, must have been my good heart that made me think the FPC was out of it's mind but only to the tune of 50k, not 100k) Falcor posted this
If Donkey isn't chaotic evil this list is invalid.
Now if a list of "evil" people is objectionable, then calling a specific user "chaotic evil" is of course clearly more objectionable. 2 reasons, first is that a general attack on a large group of people , based not on race, gender but simply mostly on the perception of "sucking or not sucking" in races makes the victims less insulted victims but people put in a group according to subjective criteria. On the other hand single-ling out a specific user, clearly targets that user specifically. Second, while evil is a general sweeping concept, of no much use actually, the moniker "chaotic evil" is a well defined character trait in Dungeons&Dragons. Here what Wikipedia says
Chaotic evilA chaotic evil character tends to have no respect for rules, other people's lives, or anything but their own desires, which are typically selfish and cruel. They set a high value on personal freedom, but do not have much regard for the lives or freedom of other people. Chaotic evil characters do not work well in groups because they resent being given orders and usually do not behave themselves unless there is no alternative. Examples of this alignment include higher forms of undead (such as liches), violent killers who strike for pleasure rather than profit, demons, red dragons, and orcs.
Clearly an attack on my character. I hereby claim to feel very insulted by this!