bergwerk(11:08): das ist ja super ... 6 in der Reihe ... passt ... und als der 2. Sprinten folgt der 3. nicht ... was ist das denn?
bergwerk(11:09): super tolll ... 3x kontrolliert und alles passte ... bbaaaaaah shit
bergwerk(11:09): hat ja bei 500 m alles gepasst
bergwerk(11:17): 16. ganz toolll
bergwerk(11:22): aber mal ernsthaft, habe 6 Fahrer in der Reihe 500,450,400, 300, 200 + 100 ... Helfen richtig drin, kein HR eingestellt ... passte bei 500, dann bei 450 fehlte bei 2 folgen drin ... wie kann das sein? bin echt angepi.... shit
bergwerk(11:24): kein fremdes HR ... meine schon
bergwerk(11:25): dachte an eine realistische Chance im Sprint ... und dann das wohl schlechteste Ergebnis seit meinem Start P: :-/
bergwerk(11:37): das war meiner erster Versuch eines Zuges ... wollte die ersten 3 auch nur je 50 m fahren lassen ... war mir nicht klar, dass die Idee doof ist ... aber davon abgesehen schon alles komisch, weil es ja erst lief und ich nix mehr einstellt habe
So the situation, he made a 6 man train (in a 7 rider/team race
) the train was there at 500, but then fell apart at 450. Settings as he says sprint from 500-450-400-300-200-100 for the 6 riders.
My comments:
1) Shocking how BW uses such bad language. Don't you want to be a "Vorbild" like Big Donkey?
2) A 6 man train is shit even in a 15 rider per team race.....Do some offline training with Holzklötze and squares, and see how far the slow one goes and how far the fast one.
3) Usually that's user's mistake. But of course it might not be.
4) Especially 11:22. And this doesn't count only for you: Seems you want to know more about it. Think (not too much) Who could answer this question? Alk and Gipfel! Not even the all-knowing Donkey can. He can tell you about 6 man trains (shit!!!) Open a bug thread yourself. I'm not c4f's maid here, unless you open a thread, your question is not a question, just whining. If you want answers they have to come, as mentioned, from Alk and Gipfel. Yes, Gipfel was in the race, but remember Radler/Buhmann? He was Radler in the races and Buhmann in the forum and as Radler he often told us to fuck off (bad language again!!!) about technical stuff, tell it to Buhmann! Meaning: Forum. It doesn't take much imagination to understand that programmers might want to just race too during races, and do the bug searching etc after, other times.
By NOT opening a thread here you are actually sabotaging the game. Who knows, there might be a bug, none of us non-programmers knows. So if it is a bug, you are a victim, but you are too lazy, too self centered, too egoistic to open a thread? YOU are sabotaging c4f by letting bugs exist longer than they otherwise would. As I said, doesn't count only for Bergwerk, as usual I use this as a general comment section to tell everybody how shit they are. So... if something could be a bug, OPEN A THREAD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! If then it isn't and others know the answers, no problem, if they aren't lazy they will answer in the thread, no bug, ok ,no problem. But this endless whining while not even having the common sense to open a thread? Brrrrrr.
5) No idea if it's a bug, something similar happened either to me or somebody else a while ago, I assumed user mistake (especially if it was me) Maybe a problem with trains if the sprinting is already in? Any differences in just follow and the sprint already in?
6) What is known is that riders whose wheel isn't sprinting follow somebody else at 500, but then often the following stays on the original non-sprinting wheel, could that be somehow connected?
