RSF Cyclingfreaks
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/RSFForum/
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/RSFForum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=7991
We had it solved before tbh, but then we introduced those standardized tables (which allows quick creation of tables with filtering), but here a name is first name + last name, so sorting defaults to first name. Maybe Alkworld has a solution.
it's possible, just not done yetGipfelstuermer wrote: ↑Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:41 pmWe had it solved before tbh, but then we introduced those standardized tables (which allows quick creation of tables with filtering), but here a name is first name + last name, so sorting defaults to first name. Maybe Alkworld has a solution.
Only unnecessary if you don't win any of the National Championships in FebruaryflockmastoR wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 11:39 amThere is a unnecessary columns on the team page ("Riders" and on the popup) with the white jersey as header and no data in the row
v 1.12.1
its not unnecessary Oskars jersey is shown there xDflockmastoR wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 11:39 amThere is a unnecessary columns on the team page ("Riders" and on the popup) with the white jersey as header and no data in the row
v 1.12.1
Ok now I get it, BUT, isn't the jersey shown in the race just next to the rider (as it was in flash), why we need a seperate column in the statistics tab? and this white jersey is somehow misleading (for me not carrying the RSF leader jersey).Hansa wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 8:18 pmits not unnecessary Oskars jersey is shown there xDflockmastoR wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 11:39 amThere is a unnecessary columns on the team page ("Riders" and on the popup) with the white jersey as header and no data in the row
v 1.12.1
That's a preparation for the NCs, national champion jerseys will be shown there and It's there for technical reasons. When I put it to the name, I can no longer have the automatic sorting (at least without substantial effort and a good technical idea how to do it)flockmastoR wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 9:06 pmOk now I get it, BUT, isn't the jersey shown in the race just next to the rider (as it was in flash), why we need a seperate column in the statistics tab? and this white jersey is somehow misleading (for me not carrying the RSF leader jersey).Hansa wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 8:18 pmits not unnecessary Oskars jersey is shown there xDflockmastoR wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 11:39 amThere is a unnecessary columns on the team page ("Riders" and on the popup) with the white jersey as header and no data in the row
v 1.12.1
True, I actually never look at the banner
If anybody has the skills, and wants to create a new banner, feel free to do so, I can easily include that. It just roughly needs the same size (current is JPG, 1024 x 150).We're planning something like that for November:Bright wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 11:45 amMaybe make divisions a bit more interesting by narrowing the size?
Because there are currently 289 teams with 1 or more riders) so in my scenario 160 teams would be in division 1-5 actually helping newer players to build their team with buyer protection in division 6/7
e.g
Division 1: 18 teams (6 demotions)
Division 2: 24 teams (6 promotions/ 8 demotions)
Division 3: 32 teams (8 promotions/ 12 demotions)
Division 4: 48 teams (12 promotions/ 16 demotions)
Division 5: 64 teams (16 promotions/24 demotions)
Division 6: no limit (24 promotions)
Division 7: unchanged
Would make division 1 more of a flex. I was very proud of reaching it, but if you're active I presume the worst scenario is jumping from 1 to 2 and back after that. Would be more fun if it's a struggle for most to stay on the top divisions.
Even better would be if teams that have 0 races in a month could drop 2 divisions at once.
i think Div7 should stay, otherwise newbies could be thrown to the auction wolves way too earlyAlkworld wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 9:57 pmWe're planning something like that for November:Bright wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 11:45 amMaybe make divisions a bit more interesting by narrowing the size?
Because there are currently 289 teams with 1 or more riders) so in my scenario 160 teams would be in division 1-5 actually helping newer players to build their team with buyer protection in division 6/7
e.g
Division 1: 18 teams (6 demotions)
Division 2: 24 teams (6 promotions/ 8 demotions)
Division 3: 32 teams (8 promotions/ 12 demotions)
Division 4: 48 teams (12 promotions/ 16 demotions)
Division 5: 64 teams (16 promotions/24 demotions)
Division 6: no limit (24 promotions)
Division 7: unchanged
Would make division 1 more of a flex. I was very proud of reaching it, but if you're active I presume the worst scenario is jumping from 1 to 2 and back after that. Would be more fun if it's a struggle for most to stay on the top divisions.
Even better would be if teams that have 0 races in a month could drop 2 divisions at once.
Current suggestion (details to be discussed):
- Background info: currently we have roughly 100 active teams in Divs 1-5, roughly 20 more in the lower divisions
- Teams in divisions 1-5: 16-18-20-22-24
- Relegated Teams in div 1-5: 3-4-5-6-7
- Div 6 will contain all the rest, 7 and 8 will be dropped (or merged with 6)
- inactive teams (0 points from previous two months and 0 races at month change) are directly put in Div 6 (also to limit farming a bit)
- auction size will be automatically adapted based on the size of div 1 to 5
- division sizes can be adapted every month, if player numbers drastically change
- Div 7 is not actually needed (technically tricky to have it as a separate division), but the point limit could easily be addedlennylenny wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 10:04 pmi think Div7 should stay, otherwise newbies could be thrown to the auction wolves way too early
how will you promote from Div 6?
please make the division sizes actually dynamic, if you need a month or two for the implementation, then i am fine with the hard coded sizes for now, but long term it will be quite a bit of administrative work i imagine
I like the idea. At the moment, it's not really a competiton to get into better divions. Less places makes it more meaningful.Alkworld wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 9:57 pmWe're planning something like that for November:Bright wrote: ↑Sun Aug 13, 2023 11:45 amMaybe make divisions a bit more interesting by narrowing the size?
Because there are currently 289 teams with 1 or more riders) so in my scenario 160 teams would be in division 1-5 actually helping newer players to build their team with buyer protection in division 6/7
e.g
Division 1: 18 teams (6 demotions)
Division 2: 24 teams (6 promotions/ 8 demotions)
Division 3: 32 teams (8 promotions/ 12 demotions)
Division 4: 48 teams (12 promotions/ 16 demotions)
Division 5: 64 teams (16 promotions/24 demotions)
Division 6: no limit (24 promotions)
Division 7: unchanged
Would make division 1 more of a flex. I was very proud of reaching it, but if you're active I presume the worst scenario is jumping from 1 to 2 and back after that. Would be more fun if it's a struggle for most to stay on the top divisions.
Even better would be if teams that have 0 races in a month could drop 2 divisions at once.
Current suggestion (details to be discussed):
- Background info: currently we have roughly 100 active teams in Divs 1-5, roughly 20 more in the lower divisions
- Teams in divisions 1-5: 16-18-20-22-24
- Relegated Teams in div 1-5: 3-4-5-6-7
- Div 6 will contain all the rest, 7 and 8 will be dropped (or merged with 6)
- inactive teams (0 points from previous two months and 0 races at month change) are directly put in Div 6 (also to limit farming a bit)
- auction size will be automatically adapted based on the size of div 1 to 5
- division sizes can be adapted every month, if player numbers drastically change
We had that in the past, but IMO it makes sense mainly, if we have more teams playing the game.Chemnitz Pro Cycling Team wrote: ↑Tue Sep 19, 2023 10:57 pmI addition, is there a way to add limitations on races being able to participate? E.g. in division 5 you can't rice cat 4 races or higher. I see some points pro it bit also against it, maybe we can open a discussion about it as well.
Why technically tricky, it's there now, no? Just no need to touch it and it stays?
This shortcut to a reset is still not needed though.
I'm changing the whole division system technically and the current division 7 is following completely different rules (promotion at any time when they reach 1500 vs promotion / relegation at the end of the month)Robyklebt wrote: ↑Fri Sep 22, 2023 3:10 pmWhy technically tricky, it's there now, no? Just no need to touch it and it stays?
IMO a nice place to see how many new teams have started lately, see who looks like a multi, etc. I'd prefer to keep it.
As for D8, that's the one inactive teams should actually go, not D6, but ok, keep everybody in D6, why not. At least every team is visible again.
It's needed at least once for moving the teams down that have been there for ages with 0 points. Without that, the resizing would lead to active teams above Div 6 being moved down to Div 6, because there's some inactive 0 points team parked in Div 3.
