dayform

[Quick]

Discussed it anywhere. Dayform is randomness +1 or -1. We know - this is realistic, but we didn't want it, because for some of you the random-part would became to high.(which meant training and JTM-riders). So, something will change soon: Jtm - auctions. Everybody has the same chance now... so there's a space for more randomness. Go dayform!

[Luna]

I have nothing against it.

Shall it be shown for the manager at the beginning of the race, or even at midnight? I would prefer to not show it at all. You have to find out by yourself, maybe at a climb or with checking power loss or just take it as surprise when it comes to the raec decision.

[auxilium torino]

normaly, if i am the manager , the riders must say to me if their are in form or not...i must to know for the race

[claw]

normaly, if i am the manager , the riders must say to me if their are in form or not...i must to know for the race

in real, you also dont know it before the race everytime

[Luna]

Yes, often it happens that one rider only speaks about it during a race, sometimes short from the finish, that he doesn't have the legs today.

[Quick]

I'd like to have dayform, because RSF would become more unpredictable... nowadays you know at 80% of mountain stages or time trials the winner.(100form doesn't bring an advantage often because you can be sure that the other have it too - in important races). And so i also would prefer not to see the dayform.

[Zentaron]

Why ride the races? Throw some dices to know whos winning.

Okay, for some races it would be nice, but as you know, i am a pure sprinter team and in sprint races there is enough, no, there is too much coincidence at the moment. And as long as that isn't changed, i am against another kind of it.

@Quick You are too fast.

[Quick]

kind of ironic that this comes from the dicemaster "le roi du sprint"

[ariostea]

i don´t know if we need dayform for less foreseeability in the races.

i think more effective would be to bring more competition into the races. meaning: having less races per day but better pelotons. and make "racing cheap and saving ennergy" but taking money with some places less attractive compared to go for a win. more competition brings less foreseeabiltiy too...

on the other hand i am not strict against it. it might be quite realistic. especially when the rider/manager does not know it. you can hear it quite often in interviews - "actually i felt really good to 30km before the finish, but then i just did not have the legs and don´t know why..."

[auxilium torino]

if you want more casualty, let us have weather preference and incident.

[Berlin Marks]

i think the dayform is a good idea!