cycling4freaks.com

Team Toto is always hanging two riders offline and then joining the race very late, not leaving any chance for the group if they don't want to gift Toto the win, this is clearly intentional offline abuse and should be punished in my eyes

Often happend but no chance. its not gentleman agreement but not against any rules.

Which fairplay rule has been broken? Or which new fairplay rule do you propose?

not directly rule break but definitely not following this abstract of the manual:

Therefore the rules of fair-play are not there to dictate to the teams their way to play/race, but to prevent that certain teams use techniques which do not have anything in common with a normal realistic race

0 cooperation because of offline abuse with no way to shake it off is definitely not in the spirit of the rules

lennylenny wrote: ↑

Fri Aug 26, 2022 2:38 pm

not directly rule break but definitely not following this abstract of the manual:

Therefore the rules of fair-play are not there to dictate to the teams their way to play/race, but to prevent that certain teams use techniques which do not have anything in common with a normal realistic race

0 cooperation because of offline abuse with no way to shake it off is definitely not in the spirit of the rules

Well, it's annoying. But he can do this kind of bs tactic even when he is on. When everybody knows he shows up, then it is not really against a certain rule. Killing escapes tactic is annoying, but you need to find riders without a group killer hanging.

It's actually exactly the kind of action the fairplay comment/vote system is for.

Robyklebt wrote: ↑

Sat Aug 27, 2022 11:43 am

It's actually exactly the kind of action the fairplay comment/vote system is for.

Now Toto is giving revenge -3 with no reason given, can those be removed?

lennylenny wrote: ↑

Thu Sep 01, 2022 11:24 pm

Robyklebt wrote: ↑

Sat Aug 27, 2022 11:43 am

It's actually exactly the kind of action the fairplay comment/vote system is for.

Now Toto is giving revenge -3 with no reason given, can those be removed?

Short, stupid but deserved question: Why?

team fl wrote: ↑

Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:54 pm

lennylenny wrote: ↑

Thu Sep 01, 2022 11:24 pm

Robyklebt wrote: ↑

Sat Aug 27, 2022 11:43 am

It's actually exactly the kind of action the fairplay comment/vote system is for.

Now Toto is giving revenge -3 with no reason given, can those be removed?

Short, stupid but deserved question: Why?

abuse of fairplay voting

lennylenny wrote: ↑

Fri Sep 02, 2022 6:50 pm

team fl wrote: ↑

Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:54 pm

lennylenny wrote: ↑

Thu Sep 01, 2022 11:24 pm

Robyklebt wrote: ↑

Sat Aug 27, 2022 11:43 am

It's actually exactly the kind of action the fairplay comment/vote system is for.

Now Toto is giving revenge -3 with no reason given, can those be removed?

Short, stupid but deserved question: Why?

abuse of fairplay voting

Well, if that would be a thing, were should we start. It's like it is, a manager can check your fairplay votings and than Totos votings and than he/she can judge.

lennylenny wrote: ↑

Fri Sep 02, 2022 6:50 pm

team fl wrote: ↑

Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:54 pm

lennylenny wrote: ↑

Thu Sep 01, 2022 11:24 pm

Robyklebt wrote: ↑

Sat Aug 27, 2022 11:43 am

It's actually exactly the kind of action the fairplay comment/vote system is for.

Now Toto is giving revenge -3 with no reason given, can those be removed?

Short, stupid but deserved question: Why?

abuse of fairplay voting

How? There are no rules for the fairplay voting beside the common ones like no aggressive language, insults, etc.