cycling4freaks.com

Once again it seems possible that today Armorique was not managed by Armorique himself, but by one of his sons.

It definitely happened before, "Armorique" claimed not to be Armorique but a son. Forgot to open a thread then. Today no clear admittance of sitting, but still, according to Chartreuse Monks the style today was more Rohazon than Armorique. If it was indeed a son, then that clearly is illegal one day sitting.

The deal that seems to be accepted is "Armorique" the father is one team.
Rohazon is an unclear number of sons, that share one team.

If that's the deal ok, but then the sons should stay in their account and the father in his. No swappings, like it possibly was today.

Here a chat excerpt, as I said, "Armorique" doesn't directly confirm that he's a son, but certainly gives the impression to do be one.

Chartreuse Monks: j'plaisante
Team Armorique: bah si tu le dis çà doit être le cas
Chartreuse Monks: on voit clairement la différence de management entre le père expérimenté et les enfants gatés :p
Chartreuse Monks: ahah donc j'avais vu juste
Big Donkey: How long were you in anyway? Plust it probably showed me off for the usual 4-10 km.....
Team Armorique: bah si tu veux il s'ne tapera le coqullard le dad
Chartreuse Monks: his sons should be punished
Chartreuse Monks: I will report it to Team Armorique father
Big Donkey: No, too late now, I'm out
Big Donkey: Ok, let's wait
Chartreuse Monks: sons playing ?
Chartreuse Monks: Team Armorique creating problems

Translation, if necessary, will be done by RfM I expect, that's what he's in the FPC for, no?

FPC is reviewing this case.