Page 1 of 1
insult of big donkey vs. OL
Posted: Wed Dec 18, 2019 11:01 pm
by scorpsche
today in general chat:
"Big Donkey<18:03>: OL hasn't posted anything worth thinking about in his life. Should we just think about it because of pity?"
Re: insult of big donkey vs. OL
Posted: Thu Jan 02, 2020 1:22 pm
by Gipfelstuermer
WARNING: NO
FINE: 0
BAN: NO
Re: insult of big donkey vs. OL
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 1:22 pm
by Robyklebt
Got a message today saying that I got a fine for this here...
Gipfelstuermer wrote: ↑Thu Jan 02, 2020 1:22 pm
WARNING: NO
FINE: 0
BAN: NO
??
Re: insult of big donkey vs. OL
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2020 6:58 pm
by scorpsche
So enlight us: how big is the "fine"?
Re: insult of big donkey vs. OL
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 8:33 am
by Gipfelstuermer
What can I say? Apologies for the too early announcement? Not really because technically every such announcement is too early and can be revised.
So decision revised by the one who can revise it:
Fine 50,000
Re: insult of big donkey vs. OL
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 4:15 pm
by Robyklebt
Completely gaga. If that's the new standard now...
Plus it wasn't even the poor persecuted and evilely (is that a word?) insulted victim to complain but an obsessed multi..
Gaga!
Re: insult of big donkey vs. OL
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2020 4:51 pm
by lesossies
Sorry,
there was a majority of 4:2 for fine.
Re: insult of big donkey vs. OL
Posted: Thu Jan 23, 2020 11:55 am
by Robyklebt
Still completely gaga...
If that's the new standard, you guys have lots of work to do...
If it isn't I can complain that there's a special rule for Donkey "insults"...
Whatever you do from now on, you lose basically
In the meantime maybe use your secret hideout to talk about information policy, how and when, and to keep impatient "insulters" like me who want to know the result of their trial maybe post "still open" when we ask how our case is developing and it hasn't been officially finalized yet. Posting premature acquittals is not ideal, premature fines neither, nothing is bad too, so "still open" seems perfect.
Btw, if you want to keep that high standard of gaga you introduced, you should talk about me calling SWE an
obsessed multi. Just because it's true doesn't make it less insulting.
And to add more, the
useless Idefix as expected was unable to read properly and has problems facing reality. The bolded are the horrible insults btw.
Gaga