Thank you for your reply, I respect your complain about off topic so I wll end it here and anything no involving my races will be opened in a new thread.
Think of it like this, had you gone to someone and just posted the useful info only in forum, not C4F chat for race chat, then I would not have a problem at all. You wouldn't even here my name. I complain because it has become problematic. I complain because as much as somebody can can say:
"What if someone new joins the game and see this collusion in the race, they won't want to come back"
Has just as much chance of saying
"What if someome new joins, sees all the arguments in the chat, race or general, and thinks, 'this isn't for me'"
You have thrown accusations, spammed chat and taunted with it and other things. Let me show you:
Something that A: Should've been posted to forum by you, not by you in chat and then by Luques in forum. And B:, shouldve been looked at more carefully that just posting what you saw.
scorpsche wrote:
TeamSWE<00:50>: aux...coro pulled you so nice but you are still not able to sprint properly
No context, just something put out in chat for seemingly no reason. Taunting
scorpsche wrote:
TeamSWE<10:28>: 6.12.2018,24 Uhr : Jaco - Quepos: HC Bergetappe 1. 00:00:00 Valerio Platini (Coroncina) 2. 00:00:26 LuisMario ValleGomez (Auxilium Torino) 3. 00:00:40 Emilio Trujillo (Auxilium Torino) 4. 00:01:06 Renzo Beccafumi (Coroncina) 5. 00:01:06 Nicola Boggia (Coroncina)
Just posting race result in chat. No relation to case. No context. Taunting to try and get a reaction.
scorpsche wrote:
TeamSWE<16:48>: 2 new Italian teams yesterday and today created - coincidence? hmmm
TeamSWE<13:45>: Aux maybe put more effort in creating new multies
Outright calling out 2 teams simply from joining and essential accusing them of being multis DAYS after they join. Awful welcome. If i saw this I wouldn't want to race again either.
scorpsche wrote:
TeamSWE<23:17>: i don't need to translate to know aux is whinin
Jumped into a conversation not even about you in a language you didn't even speak, taunting to try and get a reaction. Once again in public chat for no reason.
scorpsche wrote:
TeamSWE<10:45>: did i call you "little turd" or say "he story of his life, even his birth was a loss."? or was this donkey calling me
TeamSWE<10:49>: and "The story of his life, even his birth was a loss."?
TeamSWE<10:49>: how i changed "little turd"
TeamSWE<10:52>: what is untrue about you saying about me "The story of his life, even his birth was a loss."?
TeamSWE<10:52>: what is untrue about you calling me "little turd"?
TeamSWE<10:51>: TeamSWE<10:49>: what is out of context?TeamSWE<10:49>: and "The story of his life, even his birth was a loss."?TeamSWE<10:49>: how i changed "little turd"
TeamSWE<12:10>: what is untrue about you saying about me "The story of his life, even his birth was a loss."?
TeamSWE<12:10>: what is untrue about you calling me "little turd"?
Stemming from this whole case. Chat spam from you vs Donkey even though you have a thread opened up about it.
And in forums:
scorpsche wrote:
btw check "Amateurteam": is it "clean" or not?
No context, no reasoning. No separate thread. Just outright in public asks for a check when could've been done privately with a reason.
scorpsche wrote: ↑Wed Nov 28, 2018 12:54 pm
Maybe we should give this one a little UP?
No context, no reason. Just spam. Done several times in the past aswell with other threads where you suddenly spoke in them
______________________
There is so much all linked to this big whole case. You're so wrapped up in it that you are unwilling to change the way you make your arguments. Even if they are spam, annoying or usefulness.
Twice in my replys to you i never once mentioned whether or no ti think they are colluding yet you have brought it up as if I have. You do more harm than good. You didn;t even get Doria and co banned. It was an VPN idea that has been brought up many times over the years:
Date: Thu Jan 05, 2017 9:21 pm in an FPC thread.
Idéfix wrote: ↑Thu Jan 05, 2017 10:21 pm
Another suggestion: implement a new way to control and catch multi teams players! Nowadays, you can easily, with a single computer, play in the same time several teams with different IPs... (for example, VPN attached to a browser and not to an internet connexion exist, are free, and easy to use)
Something is probably to seek in this way...
As well as Melange and donkey in the past, way before you even started as a team.
scorpsche wrote:
Last but not least I stand by everything what I wrote and I don't care if I am liked or hated for that by you or others.
Kill the messenger but you can't kill the message!
That was all you need to say. That you won't change the way you do things. That you think I even attempting to "kill the message".
I'm not attacking Mangahn who is on the same side as you.
I'm not attacking free who is on the same side as you.
I'm not attacking Idéfix who is on the same side as you.
I'm not attacking Fanta who is on the same side with you.
Because they can construct an argument.
Because they are picking their moments to speak.
Because they have raced enough to know weird from normal.
Because they can explain why a scenario is suspicious.