TUTTIFRUTTI case

Discussion about fairness-stuff. Advices of breach of rules and so on.

Moderators: systemmods, fairplaymods

chartreusecycle
Posts: 293
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 11:15 am
Contact:

TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by chartreusecycle » Wed Oct 29, 2014 12:51 pm

Dear FPC,

I would like to open the TUTTIFRUTTI case following the study of some strange fact:
- TUTTIFRUTTI line-up in Peloponese Tour
- TUTTIFRUTTI palmares and activity

Line-up in Peloponese Tour:
603k for a Cat.2 tour
No problem if it was a regular team with 15 riders, with regular activity in RSF.
Important fact is that TUTTIFRUTTI is only a 9-riders team -> which means that for every single race (even ones he is not able to win), he should line-up a 603k team.

Palmares and Activity:
Since 2011, only 214 races with a really strange repartition -> High activity all along 2012 with a normal palmares / No activity at all in 2013 / Back in SEP-2014 with a monster team
TUTTIFRUTTI is only riding races/tour he is able to win (make sense)

Few question then:
-> How is he able to sustain such induced cost ? Is there a rule "when x team is under -xxxK budget you can not ride anymore" ?
-> What is he doing the rest of the time ? Riding with another team ?
-> How do he manage to build a new team each time ? Letting TUTTIFRUTTI in a period of non activity -> when possible RESET the team and build a new monster ?

People are asking him those questions, no answer -> Ariostea: Tutti - you have only 9 riders in your team? how do you survive financially?

TUTTIFRUTTI is a case highlighting that it is easy for a manager to:
- Build a monster team dedicated to sprint/mountain/classic with huge cost
- Use it and destroy tours
- Let it fall when all riders are too old
- Reset
- Build a new team
Paris - Roubaix 2016
Milan - San Remo 2015
Tour de France 2013

4x French Champion 2017, 2018, 2020
GP E3 Harelbeke 2020
2x Paris - Tours 2013, 2019
Gand - Wevelgem 2018
Amstel 2015
Fleche Wallonne 2015

ariostea
Posts: 200
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:56 am
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by ariostea » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:49 pm

my guess is:

the "if your budget is below minus 100k then you can´t inscript for races anymore"-rule is not working at the moment - is that possible?
(was it minus 100k? - not sure about this) - but once there was such a rule.

Rockstar Inc
Posts: 1909
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Norimberga
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by Rockstar Inc » Wed Oct 29, 2014 1:55 pm

imo it's not a case for the fairplaysection...more the technic part...maybe time to "reintroduce", next to the 100K rule, the "you can only have x "lowered price riders" ;)

Tutti is a good example how fucked up the system is ;) worst case example how to spoil the fun for others...no offense to him personally...good old "don't hate the player, hate the game" :D

@100K-Rule...was discussed in the "Girl Power Case"...Leso was involved...rule in general not working since a few years already
"I'm an old-school sprinter. I can't climb a mountain but if I am in front with 200 metres to go then there's nobody who can beat me.” Mark Cavendish, at the 2007 Eneco Tour

ariostea
Posts: 200
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:56 am
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by ariostea » Wed Oct 29, 2014 2:01 pm

rule in general not working since a few years already
that´s not good - we need this rule.

otherwise just farming a super-team and then fuck the team up and reset - is the best way to win races. I don´t think we want this.
it will only lead to farming and multi-teams...

Rockstar Inc
Posts: 1909
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Norimberga
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by Rockstar Inc » Wed Oct 29, 2014 2:28 pm

the rule isn't changend...it still exisits...but technically it's not working...was gone as the design was changed a few years ago
"I'm an old-school sprinter. I can't climb a mountain but if I am in front with 200 metres to go then there's nobody who can beat me.” Mark Cavendish, at the 2007 Eneco Tour

ariostea
Posts: 200
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:56 am
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by ariostea » Wed Oct 29, 2014 2:38 pm

yes, that´s what i mean - we need this rule working.

so this should go to the bug-forum...

User avatar
Pokemon Club
Posts: 3185
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:37 pm
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by Pokemon Club » Wed Oct 29, 2014 3:35 pm

ariostea wrote:yes, that´s what i mean - we need this rule working.

so this should go to the bug-forum...
The discussion has is place in fairplay too, as all others rules too.

ariostea
Posts: 200
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:56 am
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by ariostea » Wed Oct 29, 2014 4:27 pm

The discussion has is place in fairplay too, as all others rules too.
whatever - don´t care where we discuss that.

but Buhman should get this done.

Liquigas-CND
Posts: 443
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:40 pm
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by Liquigas-CND » Wed Oct 29, 2014 4:42 pm

Great rule.
When your finances are -100 K then you should not be able to inscript in any other tour / race.
Totally agree.
-GC: Giro'15,'16,18,19;TDF'16,'18,'20;Vuelta'16,'17,'18;Tirreno'16,Catalunya'16,'18,Suisse'16,Romandie'16, Vasco'19,Andes'16
-Stages won in GTs:57
-Classics:17

User avatar
olmania
Posts: 2572
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:06 pm
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by olmania » Fri Oct 31, 2014 12:50 pm

Please, yes, get this done.

It's a bad example for new players, kills atmosphere in groups, and they steal money and points from honest teams, building it in the good way.

Tuttifrutti is only a highlight of the situation, but it's plenty of teams profiting what was listed here.

Kaju
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:17 am
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by Kaju » Fri Oct 31, 2014 2:15 pm

Have spoken with Radler yesterday in our race about this problem. Hope he will tell Buhmann about the situation :D

Liquigas-CND
Posts: 443
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:40 pm
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by Liquigas-CND » Sat Nov 01, 2014 12:09 am

Tutti had so sell Valerio in order to be able to play next days Ș))
-GC: Giro'15,'16,18,19;TDF'16,'18,'20;Vuelta'16,'17,'18;Tirreno'16,Catalunya'16,'18,Suisse'16,Romandie'16, Vasco'19,Andes'16
-Stages won in GTs:57
-Classics:17

lesossies
Site Admin
Posts: 1945
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by lesossies » Sat Nov 01, 2014 1:18 pm

Rockstar Inc wrote:imo it's not a case for the fairplaysection...more the technic part...maybe time to "reintroduce", next to the 100K rule, the "you can only have x "lowered price riders" ;)

Tutti is a good example how fucked up the system is ;) worst case example how to spoil the fun for others...no offense to him personally...good old "don't hate the player, hate the game" :D

@100K-Rule...was discussed in the "Girl Power Case"...Leso was involved...rule in general not working since a few years already
TUTTIFRUTTI didnt break the 100k Rule !
Sorry

Rockstar Inc
Posts: 1909
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Norimberga
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by Rockstar Inc » Sat Nov 01, 2014 1:37 pm

:roll:

sure he sold a rider now...but i highly doubt he had no minus on his banc account before inscripting for his current race/races...

so please...kick your beloved sons ass and he can have a look why the 100k rule doesn't work and that it's fucking urgent to fix this problem
"I'm an old-school sprinter. I can't climb a mountain but if I am in front with 200 metres to go then there's nobody who can beat me.” Mark Cavendish, at the 2007 Eneco Tour

luques
Posts: 2233
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:39 pm
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by luques » Sat Nov 01, 2014 4:10 pm

lesossies wrote:
Rockstar Inc wrote:imo it's not a case for the fairplaysection...more the technic part...maybe time to "reintroduce", next to the 100K rule, the "you can only have x "lowered price riders" ;)

Tutti is a good example how fucked up the system is ;) worst case example how to spoil the fun for others...no offense to him personally...good old "don't hate the player, hate the game" :D

@100K-Rule...was discussed in the "Girl Power Case"...Leso was involved...rule in general not working since a few years already
TUTTIFRUTTI didnt break the 100k Rule !
Sorry
I asked him and he confirmed me the same thing. When he started the tour he was not under -100k.

He bought his strong mountain power by selling some riders last week.

And he sold the climber to be able to play Andes.

lesossies
Site Admin
Posts: 1945
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by lesossies » Sat Nov 01, 2014 9:21 pm

I can see no bug and no bug using.

TUTTIFRUTTI has a 19M team with 9 riders .

If it is needed, we can search a solution against that.

A maximal financial inscription limit for the diffrerent races in dependance of category race, tour or other.

A transfer tax depending of the amount of rided races/period could limit the profit by buying/selling riders.

We can discuss about it.

Robyklebt
Posts: 10024
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:50 pm
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by Robyklebt » Sun Nov 02, 2014 2:18 am

There's no problem in having a 19M 9 rider team.

Good thing we discussed it.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!

User avatar
olmania
Posts: 2572
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:06 pm
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by olmania » Sun Nov 02, 2014 11:22 am

A transfer tax depending of the amount of rided races/period could limit the profit by buying/selling riders.

We can discuss about it.
Would be not bad, because I think that's this farming situation (see his transfer history at a time he was not riding) that allowed him to get more cash to invest in such team.

IDF
Posts: 1676
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 7:52 pm
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by IDF » Sun Nov 02, 2014 3:34 pm

A maximal financial inscription limit for the diffrerent races in dependance of category race, tour or other.

Yep but maybe, up the salary cap for important races ( cat.6 375k --> 425k maybe etc... , same for GT) etc...
[8:11:11 PM] SM: j'ai un bug la j'arrive plus a aller sur RFM

ariostea
Posts: 200
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 12:56 am
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by ariostea » Sun Nov 02, 2014 4:44 pm

leso:
A maximal financial inscription limit for the diffrerent races in dependance of category race, tour or other.

A transfer tax depending of the amount of rided races/period could limit the profit by buying/selling riders.
ah no... this is not the problem here (at last not for me) - neither it is a problem with Tutti or Tutti´s team (that´s why the thread indeed is wrong in fairness-area)

the problem here might be: RockstarInc:
@100K-Rule...was discussed in the "Girl Power Case"...Leso was involved...rule in general not working since a few years already
is that right? if yes, that´s not good - that leads to farming and multi-teams imo.
cause it makes farming a super (but far too expensive) team very attractive - you ride this team to it´s "end" (everybody old) and reset it (or do whatever you want with it) - then you go on playing with the farm-team you farmed inbetween - and so on...

"the -100.000 = no inscription" rule can help here - we should have this working again. (we can discuss to make it -150.000 or -200.000) - but in general it´s better to have sth. like this working.
does anybody know if this rule active at the moment or not?

Hunsrueck
Posts: 1794
Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 5:22 pm
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by Hunsrueck » Sun Nov 02, 2014 5:16 pm

does anybody know if this rule active at the moment or not?
Its not active!

chartreusecycle
Posts: 293
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 11:15 am
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by chartreusecycle » Thu Jun 18, 2015 10:03 am

Could we have a IP check TUTTIFRUTTI vs team belloz ?

TUTTIFRUTTI not riding anymore, new team: team belloz with exactly the same "behaviour".
Paris - Roubaix 2016
Milan - San Remo 2015
Tour de France 2013

4x French Champion 2017, 2018, 2020
GP E3 Harelbeke 2020
2x Paris - Tours 2013, 2019
Gand - Wevelgem 2018
Amstel 2015
Fleche Wallonne 2015

lesossies
Site Admin
Posts: 1945
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 10:49 am
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by lesossies » Thu Jun 18, 2015 2:34 pm

4 teams with same IP (TUTTIFRUTTI, team belloz and 2 others ) have been first banned until the problem has been clarified.

chartreusecycle
Posts: 293
Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 11:15 am
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by chartreusecycle » Mon Jul 06, 2015 1:10 pm

team belloz is riding the TOUR DE FRANCE ?

The Fairplay Committee agrees the fact that we can create several teams ? He is the multi of TUTTIFRUTTI and 2 other teams (4 in total).

Always buying strong teams just before Tour/classics and no problem ?
Paris - Roubaix 2016
Milan - San Remo 2015
Tour de France 2013

4x French Champion 2017, 2018, 2020
GP E3 Harelbeke 2020
2x Paris - Tours 2013, 2019
Gand - Wevelgem 2018
Amstel 2015
Fleche Wallonne 2015

Rockstar Inc
Posts: 1909
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:15 pm
Location: Norimberga
Contact:

Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

Post by Rockstar Inc » Mon Jul 06, 2015 7:34 pm

the fpc doesn't agree...cause as far as i know only buh and leso got the rights to ban guys...fpc is only advising...sadly
"I'm an old-school sprinter. I can't climb a mountain but if I am in front with 200 metres to go then there's nobody who can beat me.” Mark Cavendish, at the 2007 Eneco Tour

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests