Km: 1, Steigung: 0
Susanto Situru (CircleCycle) attackiert
Dusko Petauer (CircleCycle) attackiert
Lazaro Betancourt (C.C.Gisclareny) geht mit
Rene Dattel (Ambition) geht mit
Xabier Intxausti (C.C.Gisclareny) geht mit
Felix Schneeberger (CircleCycle) geht mit
Imho Schneeberger has to get dropped and not one of the 2 guys who attacked. What do you guys think?
TdF Saitama Criterium 24h
Moderators: systemmods, fairplaymods
-
- Posts: 758
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 11:26 pm
- Contact:
Re: TdF Saitama Criterium 24h
What is your opinion based on?
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: TdF Saitama Criterium 24h
I think it is somehow because the first two really attacked, while the third was just following, so attack has priority on following.Robyklebt wrote:What is your opinion based on?
Re: TdF Saitama Criterium 24h
The Point is, that it's not stated anywhere. So far, hence, it's okay if it's one of the riders he hasn't used already in the breakaway.luques wrote:I think it is somehow because the first two really attacked, while the third was just following, so attack has priority on following.Robyklebt wrote:What is your opinion based on?
I didn't mean to say it. But I meant what I said.
Re: TdF Saitama Criterium 24h
Yep thats's true. But it isn't as well stated that in case of a team attack you have to drop the weakest one, which is maybe something useful to have.team fl wrote:The Point is, that it's not stated anywhere. So far, hence, it's okay if it's one of the riders he hasn't used already in the breakaway.luques wrote:I think it is somehow because the first two really attacked, while the third was just following, so attack has priority on following.Robyklebt wrote:What is your opinion based on?
Or in any case we should judge a team attack just basing on the consequence that it had.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests