Robyklebt wrote:Something that for example isn't covered by the rules explicitly, but should as clearly be punishable is: Lying repeatedly, trying to give others a bad reputation. Which is what you have been doing with me. And others most likely. Just read how often you have written
"Donkey is frustrated because he lost against me for 2 years" For months now, nonstop. But Liqui get serious, I've been losing here for 11 years, you seriously think I get frustrated by losing NOW? Which I've told you before, but of course you can't stop being who you are. Repeating it at nauseam... THAT indeed starts to get frustrating.
"Donkey often gives me minus votes" 4 times in a lot, a lot of races. How many races have we ridden together? And you call 4 times often? A lie. Easy disproved. Slander. Provocation.
"Donkey gives me minus votes because he doesn't like how I ride" 3 times out of 4 I've told you why you got minus. And it's not "because I don't like how you ride". So again, slander, provocation. Being what you are.
What makes this one funny is, that you complain (falsely) about me and others (maybe true, don't know) giving you minus for tactical decisions. But you yourself DO give out -2 for tactical decisions. So what you want seems to be: Others shouldn't give out -2 for tactics. But you feel you should, to warn others.
"Donkey gives me minus without reason". Once without stated reason in the fairness section, but I think I made it clear in the race chat for what it was. So without reason is again: Nothing but slander.
-2 with "for waiting me to ride first...." as comment. Now, of course I said in the race chat WHY I wasn't riding. And it had nothing to do with you. So this is slander again.
Then not specifically to me, but in general, you've announced repeatedly that in 2017 you don't want to win (which is against the fairness rules btw, but since you'll claim your joking you're safe) BUT just piss off others. How? You've made it clear, with insults, but not explicits ones, with provocation, slander etc.
So... stuff like this isn't explicitly forbidden in the rules. But after a while, slanderers and liars, people who only want to take the fun away from others should be taken to account. It's not only about the written down rules, it's about the spirit of the law.
You're a good example of somebody who by now should be paying a big fine for continued slander and lies. My usual tactic is to start insulting people like you, I'm pretty rich right now too, for my standard at least, over a million in the bank with the youth rider for march bought, happens every 5 years something like that, so could afford the fine coming my way if I start. But maybe once I could try something different? Less fun, but cheaper. Maybe open a fairness thread, if you don't start behaving like what you are not. (Sorry, can't resist, but doubt you'll get it, so it's ok)
As FL stated, not only what is explicitly written down is punishable.
And calling Idéfix a ultra-nationalist of course is not only ok, but completely normal. 1) Somebody calls me a brother of free team and expects what exactly? Nobody will call me that without getting me on their back. He had his chance to apologize, he didn't. I consider Idéfix freely insultable. 2) Idéfix. Ever read Asterix? What else, if not a ultra nationalist is Idéfix? If that little insulting guy who goes under the knickname "idéfix" feels insulted by that, excellent, but at the same time not my fault he has absolutely no sense of humor. And thinks he can insult others but won't get insulted back. And being called "free team's brother" IS an insult. Idéfix has made it pretty clear what he thinks of free team (almost as little as I do).
I did not lie, i just changed my mind in few cases in the past with regards to tactics that i announced in the chat.
Insulting me, giving me several times -2 and reporting my attacks in the fairplay section plus the last 2 years when i was too dominant for you makes me believe you are a bit frustrated! Maybe is just a supposition but is based on several arguments.
As already told you, maybe i was not clear enough, i gave you -2 yesterday because you did not cooperate in time even if you had not the weakest rider in the escape.
I dont really care the reasons why you give me -2.
What i wanted to point out is that the fairplay voting should not lead to penalties!
I said that i dont want to win in 2017! but being the greatest manager in RSF it seems it;s impossible for me not to win!
)) Anyway i set the goals for my team! and if i decide that the goal is to be 2nd or 3rd it's my problem!
I said that because i was a bit euphoric after being so succesful in 2016. Prove i did not want to win a race in 2017? Except today when i was offline for abt 40 minutes and i decided not to sprint because the others rode the entire race!
Yes, open a thread asap as you did in the past, open a thread for nothing! you are good at that.
Better open a thread for your insults!!!
This would mean that you respect yourself and others by admitting your mistakes!
-GC: Giro'15,'16,18,19;TDF'16,'18,'20;Vuelta'16,'17,'18;Tirreno'16,Catalunya'16,'18,Suisse'16,Romandie'16, Vasco'19,Andes'16
-Stages won in GTs:57
-Classics:17