Le Tour 2022
Moderators: systemmods, Calendarmods
Le Tour 2022
This morning bad weather in northern Germany... so I checked my designing skills and tried this with doing stage 1 of TDF 2022. Did this with gpx file from La Flamme Rouge.
First saved as tdf_2021_stage_1 and then saw it's saying 2021 so again saved it at tdf_2022_stage_1
Now questions. Where can I find what I designed? How can I upload link and stage pic here? What is the wished "naming" of stages and Tour describtion?
First saved as tdf_2021_stage_1 and then saw it's saying 2021 so again saved it at tdf_2022_stage_1
Now questions. Where can I find what I designed? How can I upload link and stage pic here? What is the wished "naming" of stages and Tour describtion?
-
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:43 am
- Location: Weltenbummler
- Contact:
Re: Le Tour 2022
Thanks, Bear.
You can "load" the design in the Race Editor by typing e.g. "tdf_2022_stage_1.c4f" and then "load file from server".
You can also find the race using an url using "http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... hp?rennen=" and then the race name, e.g. http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_1
The same link can be used to show it to everyone here. And you were already successful in showing the picture, where you just use http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/pngfiles/ and then the race name.
Regarding the race name: There is no pre-defined naming. As long as it include the race name (tdf), the year (2022) and the stage number (1), it is fine. For a tour like this, of course it is useful to use the same naming for every stage, so
tdf_2022_stage_1
tdf_2022_stage_2
tdf_2022_stage_3
etc.
Let me know if you have time to design more TDF stages (then I can focus on react development), but otherwise I am happy to design some stages, too.
GIP MASTERPLAN
Gameplay: Flexible Min-Tact. Improve Sprint System. Windkante.
Marketing: Re-attract old players. Advertisement. Social Media.
New Players: Fair Start Budget, New Tutorial.
Fairplay: Improve FPC features, Fair Prize Money Disribution.
Gameplay: Flexible Min-Tact. Improve Sprint System. Windkante.
Marketing: Re-attract old players. Advertisement. Social Media.
New Players: Fair Start Budget, New Tutorial.
Fairplay: Improve FPC features, Fair Prize Money Disribution.
-
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:43 am
- Location: Weltenbummler
- Contact:
Re: Le Tour 2022
Do you already know if you want to continue designing TDF? Would be great help for the game.
Otherwise, no problem, then maybe I start soon.
GIP MASTERPLAN
Gameplay: Flexible Min-Tact. Improve Sprint System. Windkante.
Marketing: Re-attract old players. Advertisement. Social Media.
New Players: Fair Start Budget, New Tutorial.
Fairplay: Improve FPC features, Fair Prize Money Disribution.
Gameplay: Flexible Min-Tact. Improve Sprint System. Windkante.
Marketing: Re-attract old players. Advertisement. Social Media.
New Players: Fair Start Budget, New Tutorial.
Fairplay: Improve FPC features, Fair Prize Money Disribution.
Re: Le Tour 2022
No times at the Moment to design and race.
Re: Le Tour 2022
If you need help for specific stages (especially those that might not be that gc relevant) just contact me some days in advance then i can also draw 2 or 3 of them
Re: Le Tour 2022
From Tuesday on I should have time too, so the TdF designing boss (whoever that is, but I'm looking at Gipfel for the moment) should just tell me which stages to design.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: Le Tour 2022
No order from the designing boss, so I just started. Stage 2, 3 and 4(4 in work while I post this, will appear soon, just post it before somebody else starts...)
Changed the name of the tour though in the editor, for stage 1 too. It's Le Tour 22 now, easier when putting online, since last years was called Le Tour too (online name will be the same as last year, just in the editor) So other designers: Le Tour 22 as Tour name please.
Stage 2: flat
A 6 at km 73, 0.9 km a 5.7% according to la flamme rouge, could be a 5 too.
The hill at the end is 2 2 1 1, the bridge, goes up to 65 meters, made it 60...
Mintact if not mentioned otherwise is 30km. Complaints welcome
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_2
Stage 3: flat
No sieb km
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_3
Stage 4: hilly
171 km, a 7 at 161, some sieb km before too.
29 km mintact
Pavé at Cote de Cassel 4** 4* Same as in our Dunkerque edition 2018. Was 4** 4** in 2016, didn't check further. Will look at it in google street tomorrow in the train or so.
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_4
Done for today.
If somebody designs:
Don't forget that stage 5 will be stage 6 in the editor, since the rest day will come in after stage 3... etc etc, after the second race day +2...after the third +3.
Changed the name of the tour though in the editor, for stage 1 too. It's Le Tour 22 now, easier when putting online, since last years was called Le Tour too (online name will be the same as last year, just in the editor) So other designers: Le Tour 22 as Tour name please.
Stage 2: flat
A 6 at km 73, 0.9 km a 5.7% according to la flamme rouge, could be a 5 too.
The hill at the end is 2 2 1 1, the bridge, goes up to 65 meters, made it 60...
Mintact if not mentioned otherwise is 30km. Complaints welcome
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_2
Stage 3: flat
No sieb km
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_3
Stage 4: hilly
171 km, a 7 at 161, some sieb km before too.
29 km mintact
Pavé at Cote de Cassel 4** 4* Same as in our Dunkerque edition 2018. Was 4** 4** in 2016, didn't check further. Will look at it in google street tomorrow in the train or so.
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_4
Done for today.
If somebody designs:
Don't forget that stage 5 will be stage 6 in the editor, since the rest day will come in after stage 3... etc etc, after the second race day +2...after the third +3.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: Le Tour 2022
Argh should have told here that i spoke to gipfel that i will do those 3 (or better i already wanted to have done it but was sick in the weekend)
Re: Le Tour 2022
Always announce here! Still time to do other stages.
I will start doing the next 3 ones now...
I will start doing the next 3 ones now...
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: Le Tour 2022
Stage 5: Classified as middle mountain like on the official site (accidentée)
Pave stage, 157 km, mintact at km 100, before the second sector.
Did it easy, no checking, no thinking, just took the classification from la flamme rouge:
COBBLES SECTOR: 1. Hasnon à Wallers (+++, 1600 m, Km 152.0), 2. Bousignies à Millonfosse (+++, 1400 m, Km 144.9), 3. Tilloy-lez-Marchiennes à Sars-et-Rosières (++++, 2400 m, Km 139.3), 4. Warlaing à Brillon (+++, 2400 m, Km 135.8), 5. Erre à Wandignies-Hamage (++++, 2800 m, Km 129.6), 6. Abscon (++, 1500 m, Km 121.1), 7. Monchecourt à Émerchicourt (+++, 1300 m, Km 115.4), 8. Émerchicourt à Monchecourt (+++, 1600 m, Km 112.5), 9. Wasnes-au-Bac à Marcq-en-Ostrevent (+++, 1400 m, Km 107.9), 10. Eswars à Paillencourt (++, 1600 m, Km 102.3), 11. Fressain à Villers-au-Tertre (+++, 1400 m, Km 81.0).
Then adapted for length, so the first sector (well 11 but first on the road) is 1400 and ***, so made it *** *, later sectors same classification, but 1600 are *** **. I suppose the rating can be found somewhere on the le tour site, but I didn't find it...
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_5
Stage 6: 220 km, hilly
Finish 10 -1 -3 -4 6 5, could be done differently too I guess.
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_6
Stage 7: HC
Last 7 km taken from the Tour site.
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_7
Done for today and tomorrow. Corrections to the stages done so far welcome.
Will continue designing on Friday most likely, other designers of course welcome until then! More than welcome
flocke: Fixed your stage 6 link
Pave stage, 157 km, mintact at km 100, before the second sector.
Did it easy, no checking, no thinking, just took the classification from la flamme rouge:
COBBLES SECTOR: 1. Hasnon à Wallers (+++, 1600 m, Km 152.0), 2. Bousignies à Millonfosse (+++, 1400 m, Km 144.9), 3. Tilloy-lez-Marchiennes à Sars-et-Rosières (++++, 2400 m, Km 139.3), 4. Warlaing à Brillon (+++, 2400 m, Km 135.8), 5. Erre à Wandignies-Hamage (++++, 2800 m, Km 129.6), 6. Abscon (++, 1500 m, Km 121.1), 7. Monchecourt à Émerchicourt (+++, 1300 m, Km 115.4), 8. Émerchicourt à Monchecourt (+++, 1600 m, Km 112.5), 9. Wasnes-au-Bac à Marcq-en-Ostrevent (+++, 1400 m, Km 107.9), 10. Eswars à Paillencourt (++, 1600 m, Km 102.3), 11. Fressain à Villers-au-Tertre (+++, 1400 m, Km 81.0).
Then adapted for length, so the first sector (well 11 but first on the road) is 1400 and ***, so made it *** *, later sectors same classification, but 1600 are *** **. I suppose the rating can be found somewhere on the le tour site, but I didn't find it...
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_5
Stage 6: 220 km, hilly
Finish 10 -1 -3 -4 6 5, could be done differently too I guess.
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_6
Stage 7: HC
Last 7 km taken from the Tour site.
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_7
Done for today and tomorrow. Corrections to the stages done so far welcome.
Will continue designing on Friday most likely, other designers of course welcome until then! More than welcome
flocke: Fixed your stage 6 link
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: Le Tour 2022
Will design stage 8-10 later today. Profiles in this post when done.
8: middle mountain, for climbers (or escape)
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_8
9: HC with rather easy finish. Used the Le Tour info for the last climb, not fully convinced by it, doesn't really seem to add up...
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_9
10: middle mountain stage, easy, except the last climb which should see a climber/80-70 win, or a superclassic. Design see 9, same deal. Not high quality design, will try to take more time for the next ones, no more Le Tour profiles, cyclingcols or better I think. ..
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_10
8: middle mountain, for climbers (or escape)
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_8
9: HC with rather easy finish. Used the Le Tour info for the last climb, not fully convinced by it, doesn't really seem to add up...
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 22_stage_9
10: middle mountain stage, easy, except the last climb which should see a climber/80-70 win, or a superclassic. Design see 9, same deal. Not high quality design, will try to take more time for the next ones, no more Le Tour profiles, cyclingcols or better I think. ..
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_10
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
-
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:43 am
- Location: Weltenbummler
- Contact:
Re: Le Tour 2022
Sorry, I was cycling/vacationing in France and then this PHP problem happened. On my way home now and hopefully I have time to contribute... maybe tomorrow... But given the situation of course happy if you/others can continue.
GIP MASTERPLAN
Gameplay: Flexible Min-Tact. Improve Sprint System. Windkante.
Marketing: Re-attract old players. Advertisement. Social Media.
New Players: Fair Start Budget, New Tutorial.
Fairplay: Improve FPC features, Fair Prize Money Disribution.
Gameplay: Flexible Min-Tact. Improve Sprint System. Windkante.
Marketing: Re-attract old players. Advertisement. Social Media.
New Players: Fair Start Budget, New Tutorial.
Fairplay: Improve FPC features, Fair Prize Money Disribution.
Re: Le Tour 2022
I will go for stage 11 today or tomorrow.
Re: Le Tour 2022
Stage 11 done. Hopefully saved correctly. saved as tdf_2022_stage_11
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_11
Checked the climbs only on TDF page and tried to go a good way between going up or down with .5%
Min tact at km140. Before Telegraphe seems too early for stage 11. So we we can wait until end of downhill.
Please let me know if something needs to be better.
flocke: Added the link to the profile
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_11
Checked the climbs only on TDF page and tried to go a good way between going up or down with .5%
Min tact at km140. Before Telegraphe seems too early for stage 11. So we we can wait until end of downhill.
Please let me know if something needs to be better.
flocke: Added the link to the profile
Re: Le Tour 2022
12 done.
saved as letour22_12
Sorry for not being correct to have the same data name everytime. I am not used to change it and miss it all the time. But I can change it afterwards if wanted.
BTW. stage 11 saved as stage number 13 and 12 as 14 due to rest days. I think at least this is correct.
Croix de Fer and Alpe dHuez I only checked with letour page. did not checked former editions. dont know if i can even check this at the moment.
min tact at 150 before Alpe dHuez before earlier doesnt make sense or is much too early.
saved as letour22_12
Sorry for not being correct to have the same data name everytime. I am not used to change it and miss it all the time. But I can change it afterwards if wanted.
BTW. stage 11 saved as stage number 13 and 12 as 14 due to rest days. I think at least this is correct.
Croix de Fer and Alpe dHuez I only checked with letour page. did not checked former editions. dont know if i can even check this at the moment.
min tact at 150 before Alpe dHuez before earlier doesnt make sense or is much too early.
Re: Le Tour 2022
I do stage 13 - hopefully have time for more but can not promise
Will be added here soon
Done it now:
Saved as letour22_13
Mintact from KM 158 (before the Cote de la Fage)
Checked in Detail the Mende climb which is 8 10 11 for me (according to letour its 8,3 10,5 and 10,9) and the Fage rest i followed the laflammerougegpx
More info to come in the evening
Will be added here soon
Done it now:
Saved as letour22_13
Mintact from KM 158 (before the Cote de la Fage)
Checked in Detail the Mende climb which is 8 10 11 for me (according to letour its 8,3 10,5 and 10,9) and the Fage rest i followed the laflammerougegpx
More info to come in the evening
Re: Le Tour 2022
That's actually stage 14!Chense wrote: ↑Sun Jun 26, 2022 11:42 amI do stage 13 - hopefully have time for more but can not promise
Will be added here soon
Done it now:
Saved as letour22_13
Mintact from KM 158 (before the Cote de la Fage)
Checked in Detail the Mende climb which is 8 10 11 for me (according to letour its 8,3 10,5 and 10,9) and the Fage rest i followed the laflammerougegpx
More info to come in the evening
You'll need to change the name etc. later!
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: Le Tour 2022
In the meantime I'll design stage 13, 15 and 16
13: flat, but hills. Last sieb-km at 144. early in the last climb. In reality a sprint (but not 100% either really) at c4f probably not
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_13
15: Flat, 202 km, few sieb-km, last one a 7 at 144, just before the IS.
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_15
16: Middle mountain, 179 km, mintact at 144, start of Mur de Péguère. TdF info on their site continues to be complete shit, first 3 km of that climb according to them 5.9-5.5-6.5, start at 631 and after these 3 km we are at....789, 21 meters off the given percentages. . Idiots. Most important race in the world and they don't manage to put up sensible info? Used cyclingcols for this one, Port de Lers TdF
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_16
13: flat, but hills. Last sieb-km at 144. early in the last climb. In reality a sprint (but not 100% either really) at c4f probably not
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_13
15: Flat, 202 km, few sieb-km, last one a 7 at 144, just before the IS.
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_15
16: Middle mountain, 179 km, mintact at 144, start of Mur de Péguère. TdF info on their site continues to be complete shit, first 3 km of that climb according to them 5.9-5.5-6.5, start at 631 and after these 3 km we are at....789, 21 meters off the given percentages. . Idiots. Most important race in the world and they don't manage to put up sensible info? Used cyclingcols for this one, Port de Lers TdF
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_16
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: Le Tour 2022
As i am totally unable with that editor can you also do it? But thanks for the reminder ... sheer dumbnessRobyklebt wrote: ↑Sun Jun 26, 2022 3:05 pmThat's actually stage 14!Chense wrote: ↑Sun Jun 26, 2022 11:42 amI do stage 13 - hopefully have time for more but can not promise
Will be added here soon
Done it now:
Saved as letour22_13
Mintact from KM 158 (before the Cote de la Fage)
Checked in Detail the Mende climb which is 8 10 11 for me (according to letour its 8,3 10,5 and 10,9) and the Fage rest i followed the laflammerougegpx
More info to come in the evening
You'll need to change the name etc. later!
Re: Le Tour 2022
Done, was easy. All I had to do was change the 13 to 14 in the title. And put 16 instead of 15 in the stage-number box.
Anyway, 17-21 left, now 3 rest days so stage number box is +3, 20-24....
Anyway, 17-21 left, now 3 rest days so stage number box is +3, 20-24....
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: Le Tour 2022
Going for the last 5 stages now.
17: 130 km, usual mess with the percentages (now figured at least out they don't put the lines at the km mark, but just somewhere)
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_17
18: 144km, mintact at 102, start of Col de Spandelles
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_18
19: 188 km. Sieb km at the 2 cat 4, mintact before the second one.
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_19
20: ITT, 41 km, mintact km 1
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_20
21: 11
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_21
And gave out wrong info regarding the numbering of the stages.... that was when putting it online only of course... Now had to correct all again, idiot Donkey.
Anyway, all done! Complaints fast!
17: 130 km, usual mess with the percentages (now figured at least out they don't put the lines at the km mark, but just somewhere)
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_17
18: 144km, mintact at 102, start of Col de Spandelles
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_18
19: 188 km. Sieb km at the 2 cat 4, mintact before the second one.
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_19
20: ITT, 41 km, mintact km 1
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_20
21: 11
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2_stage_21
And gave out wrong info regarding the numbering of the stages.... that was when putting it online only of course... Now had to correct all again, idiot Donkey.
Anyway, all done! Complaints fast!
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: Le Tour 2022
I saw Coe thinking of stage 5, the cobble stage. So I think a little bit about it too. Probably Coe has an eye on the length.
I would say it's deigners choice in the end... but my thoughts.
If a sector is 2.1 km long, leave it with 2km in c4f. But starting from 2.2 in reality I would make it 3 in c4f. And I would start with a low pavé definition. So for example sector 3. Tilloy-lez-Marchiennes à Sars-et-Rosières (++++, 2400 m, Km 139.3) I would do: **,****,****
Why? Because if a group runs into a pavé sector they have good speed and the beginning also less skilled riders can ride fast because they run into with higher speed. Last part of pavé is hard no matter how fast they enter into in pavé. Why not leave it with 2km? Because even 200m in cobbles have in impact and should have in c4f.
If it would be like 2700m long I would go ***,****,**** I think you see how I mean it.
Maybe we could even find a suitable range to design it the same for the future...
2.1 = 2km
2.2 = 1st km *
2.3 = 1st km **
2.4 = 1st km **
2.5 = 1st km **
2.6 = 1st km ***
2.7 = 1st km ***
2.8 = 1st km ****
2.9 = 1st km ****
(example for a **** pavé sector)
I would say it's deigners choice in the end... but my thoughts.
If a sector is 2.1 km long, leave it with 2km in c4f. But starting from 2.2 in reality I would make it 3 in c4f. And I would start with a low pavé definition. So for example sector 3. Tilloy-lez-Marchiennes à Sars-et-Rosières (++++, 2400 m, Km 139.3) I would do: **,****,****
Why? Because if a group runs into a pavé sector they have good speed and the beginning also less skilled riders can ride fast because they run into with higher speed. Last part of pavé is hard no matter how fast they enter into in pavé. Why not leave it with 2km? Because even 200m in cobbles have in impact and should have in c4f.
If it would be like 2700m long I would go ***,****,**** I think you see how I mean it.
Maybe we could even find a suitable range to design it the same for the future...
2.1 = 2km
2.2 = 1st km *
2.3 = 1st km **
2.4 = 1st km **
2.5 = 1st km **
2.6 = 1st km ***
2.7 = 1st km ***
2.8 = 1st km ****
2.9 = 1st km ****
(example for a **** pavé sector)
Re: Le Tour 2022
Regarding Coesitz concerns: Not only pavé will be more selective in practice in C4F, the same applies for mountains and TTs as well. It's always interesting to see how seemingly average (real) riders suddenly ride great ITTs when they really go 100%. Conclusion: C4F is not real life
-
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:43 am
- Location: Weltenbummler
- Contact:
Re: Le Tour 2022
Big thanks to Roby, Bear and TTV. Great job from them, while I had not enough time (vacation, php problem, covid...). Without players like you, this game couldn't exist anymore! Ok, without Alk it couldn't exist anymore! But without you, neither.
But I will help Coesitz and complain about missing pavé!
Stage 1: Schloss Amalienburg, roughly at km8, could be * pavé .https://www.google.com/maps/@55.6845906 ... 312!8i6656
Stage 3: Sonderborg, roughly 10km before the finish, could be **, cobbles are roughly 500m.
https://www.google.com/maps/@54.9099809 ... 384!8i8192
Stage 7: Planche des Belles Filles. Last km is gravel, isn't it? Should be * then. Because of the KOM, could also be the KM before (otherwise bug).
https://www.quickstep-alphavinylteam.co ... 879456.jpg
Stage 10: Megeve, nothing to do with pavé, but when I checked it was wondering if last km is really +5? On flamme-rouge they say +3.5, but OK TDF website says 4.5 and then a tiny 7.1 ramp?? Where is that? I thought that's the finish on the airport? shouldn't that be a rather constant gradient? Mysterious to me but I guess OK to follow ASO informaiton. Youtube video shows Kamna's win there in Dauphine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oqRT9CQ_2I
Stage 21: Isn't there pavé on the final lap? And weak riders without energy get dropped there sometimes? ... Last year only 99 of 141 riders finished in the peloton on the stage. 42 riders got dropped and lost up to 12 minutes... so it's not like you cannot sieb there in real life...
https://www.google.com/maps/@48.8722653 ... 384!8i8192
https://www.letour.fr/en/rankings
So far the gipfel-pavé-lover-complaints. I leave it to designers if they want to add something or not
Another important note. Classifications:
Green:
Stages “without particular difficulties” (Stages 2,3,4,5,6,8,13,15,19,21) 50-30-20-18-16-14-12-10-8-7-6-5-4-3 and 2 points for the first 15 riders
“Rolling” stages (Stages 7,10,14,16): 30-25-22-19-17-15-13-11-9-7-6- 5-4-3-2 points
“Very difficult” stages (Stages 4,9,11,12,17,18) : 20-17-15-13-11- 10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 points
Time trials (Stages 1, 20), 20-17-15-13-11-10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 points
Intermediate sprints: 20-17-15-13-11-10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 points
Polka dot:
Hors Catégorie (7 in total): 20-15-12-10-8-6-4-2 points
Category 1 climbs (10): 10-8-6-4-2-1 points
Category 2 (6): 5-3-2-1 points
Category 3 (16): 2-1 points
Category 4 (22): 1 point
Bonus seconds:
NO bonus seconds at IS or KOMs.
10-6-4 at the finish line on each stage.
If I understood Alk correctly, he is implementing the real points.
Yep, that triggered me Stage 5, no official ASO info on sectors, so I trust Roby's research result / judgement.
But I will help Coesitz and complain about missing pavé!
Stage 1: Schloss Amalienburg, roughly at km8, could be * pavé .https://www.google.com/maps/@55.6845906 ... 312!8i6656
Stage 3: Sonderborg, roughly 10km before the finish, could be **, cobbles are roughly 500m.
https://www.google.com/maps/@54.9099809 ... 384!8i8192
Stage 7: Planche des Belles Filles. Last km is gravel, isn't it? Should be * then. Because of the KOM, could also be the KM before (otherwise bug).
https://www.quickstep-alphavinylteam.co ... 879456.jpg
Stage 10: Megeve, nothing to do with pavé, but when I checked it was wondering if last km is really +5? On flamme-rouge they say +3.5, but OK TDF website says 4.5 and then a tiny 7.1 ramp?? Where is that? I thought that's the finish on the airport? shouldn't that be a rather constant gradient? Mysterious to me but I guess OK to follow ASO informaiton. Youtube video shows Kamna's win there in Dauphine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oqRT9CQ_2I
Stage 21: Isn't there pavé on the final lap? And weak riders without energy get dropped there sometimes? ... Last year only 99 of 141 riders finished in the peloton on the stage. 42 riders got dropped and lost up to 12 minutes... so it's not like you cannot sieb there in real life...
https://www.google.com/maps/@48.8722653 ... 384!8i8192
https://www.letour.fr/en/rankings
So far the gipfel-pavé-lover-complaints. I leave it to designers if they want to add something or not
Another important note. Classifications:
Green:
Stages “without particular difficulties” (Stages 2,3,4,5,6,8,13,15,19,21) 50-30-20-18-16-14-12-10-8-7-6-5-4-3 and 2 points for the first 15 riders
“Rolling” stages (Stages 7,10,14,16): 30-25-22-19-17-15-13-11-9-7-6- 5-4-3-2 points
“Very difficult” stages (Stages 4,9,11,12,17,18) : 20-17-15-13-11- 10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 points
Time trials (Stages 1, 20), 20-17-15-13-11-10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 points
Intermediate sprints: 20-17-15-13-11-10-9-8-7-6-5-4-3-2-1 points
Polka dot:
Hors Catégorie (7 in total): 20-15-12-10-8-6-4-2 points
Category 1 climbs (10): 10-8-6-4-2-1 points
Category 2 (6): 5-3-2-1 points
Category 3 (16): 2-1 points
Category 4 (22): 1 point
Bonus seconds:
NO bonus seconds at IS or KOMs.
10-6-4 at the finish line on each stage.
If I understood Alk correctly, he is implementing the real points.
GIP MASTERPLAN
Gameplay: Flexible Min-Tact. Improve Sprint System. Windkante.
Marketing: Re-attract old players. Advertisement. Social Media.
New Players: Fair Start Budget, New Tutorial.
Fairplay: Improve FPC features, Fair Prize Money Disribution.
Gameplay: Flexible Min-Tact. Improve Sprint System. Windkante.
Marketing: Re-attract old players. Advertisement. Social Media.
New Players: Fair Start Budget, New Tutorial.
Fairplay: Improve FPC features, Fair Prize Money Disribution.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests