Giro 2022

Moderators: systemmods, Calendarmods

Post Reply
Gipfelstuermer
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:43 am
Location: Weltenbummler
Contact:

Giro 2022

Post by Gipfelstuermer » Sat Apr 09, 2022 2:01 am

Time to get into the mood !

If luques can implement this... or Alk... or maybe I can...

Maglia Ciclamino Points
Flat: 50 – 35 – 25 – 18 – 14 – 12 – 10 – 8 – 7 – 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1
Middle Mountain: 25 – 18 – 12 – 8 – 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1
Mountain / ITT: 15 – 12 – 9 – 7 – 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1

IS: 12 – 8 – 6 – 5 – 4 – 3 – 2 – 1

https://www.cyclingstage.com/giro-2022- ... ification/

Maglia Azzurra Points
Cima Coppi: 50 – 30 – 20 – 14 – 10 – 6 – 4 – 2 – 1
1st category: 40 – 18 – 12 – 9 – 6 – 4 – 2 – 1
2nd category: 18 – 8 – 6 – 4 – 2 – 1
3rd category: 9 – 4 – 2 – 1
4th category: 3 – 2 – 1

https://www.cyclingstage.com/giro-2022- ... ification/

Bonifications
10-6-4 second at the end of the stage and 3-2-1 second for the second IS. (normal)


The Route
Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro01
Type: Flat
Min-Tact: km180

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro02
Type: ITT
Min-Tact: km1

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro03
Type: Flat
Min-Tact: km186


REST DAY


Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro04
Type: Mountain / HC
Min-Tact: km130

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro05
Type: Flat
Min-Tact: km146

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro06
Type: Flat
Min-Tact: km180

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro07
Type: Hilly
Min-Tact: km168

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro08
Type: Hilly
Min-Tact: km116

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro09
Type: Mountain
Min-Tact: km126


REST DAY


Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro10
Type: Hilly
Min-Tact: km172

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro11
Type: Flat
Min-Tact: km194

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro12
Type: Hilly
Min-Tact: km170

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro13
Type: Flat
Min-Tact: km112

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro14
Type: Mountain
Min-Tact: km78

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro15
Type: Mountain
Min-Tact: km156


REST DAY


Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro16
Type: Mountain
Min-Tact: km182

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro17
Type: Mountain
Min-Tact: km122

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro18
Type: Flat
Min-Tact: km136

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro19
Type: Hilly
Min-Tact: km166

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro20
Type: Mountain
Min-Tact: km112

Image
Profile: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 2022giro21
Type: ITT
Min-Tact: km1
GIP MASTERPLAN
Gameplay: Flexible Min-Tact. Improve Sprint System. Windkante.
Marketing: Re-attract old players. Advertisement. Social Media.
New Players: Fair Start Budget, New Tutorial.
Fairplay: Improve FPC features, Fair Prize Money Disribution.

Mangahn
Posts: 234
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 11:26 am
Contact:

Re: Giro 2022

Post by Mangahn » Sat Apr 16, 2022 8:11 am

Danke Gipfel! Wann war eine GT zuletzt soweit vor dem Monatswechsel fertig? Super!

Robyklebt
Posts: 10012
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Giro 2022

Post by Robyklebt » Sat Apr 16, 2022 3:37 pm

Most likely one of the GTs last year my dear Manghi? If you actually paid attention you'd have realized that Gipfel usually finishes the Giro very early....
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!

Hansa
Posts: 950
Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 8:27 pm
Contact:

Re: Giro 2022

Post by Hansa » Tue May 03, 2022 7:38 pm

do we get the Giro points for sprint and GPms?
Hansa

est. 03.08.2009

Alkworld
Posts: 1129
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Giro 2022

Post by Alkworld » Fri May 06, 2022 8:31 am

Hanse wrote:
Tue May 03, 2022 7:38 pm
do we get the Giro points for sprint and GPms?
I might have adapted the points for Giro. Will see at the 9am edition if it worked or I broke the whole game ;)

Alkworld
Posts: 1129
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 8:40 pm
Contact:

Re: Giro 2022

Post by Alkworld » Fri May 06, 2022 10:59 am

Alkworld wrote:
Fri May 06, 2022 8:31 am
Hanse wrote:
Tue May 03, 2022 7:38 pm
do we get the Giro points for sprint and GPms?
I might have adapted the points for Giro. Will see at the 9am edition if it worked or I broke the whole game ;)
Worked fine at 9am, but keep an eye one the other mountain prizes, today there was only cat4

Robyklebt
Posts: 10012
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Giro 2022

Post by Robyklebt » Tue May 10, 2022 4:16 pm

A post by the notoriously ill-tempered Donkey! Better run away, hide, don't read, ignore, safest thing to do? Or not? Anyway, due to the hypersensitivity of the fcp when it comes to Donkey posts there will be no insults, but they are very much implied, feel free to fine me for them anyway.

Giro design, fast, but... yes, as often is the case imprecise.

Today's stage:

Image

Twice pavé: 1km before 1 km after the last intermediate in Biancavilla. Today in the train I had some time... little research:
In the center of Biancavilla there is indeed some pavé. But it's the "big platten" kind of pavé, don't know how to say that in English. It's a bit over 1 km.... . The map on the Giro site (on the mobile at least) is rather unclear where the route passes exactly, so if we pass there...? From google street view it's it's MAXIMUM *. Possibly 0. But if we go to la flamme rouge, they design the route as going off that road before this kind of pavé starts, and there is exactly 0 km of pavé. 0 meters. It's perfectly fine sicilian asphalt (sicilian asphalt of course includes potholes and lots of "risse" etc). Actually I'm not sure why we have pavé there, couldn't find any info on pavé being there? Maybe Gipfel can enlighten us?

Another problem with today's stage: Last kms 6-3-0. It should be 6-5-0. Looking at the excellent Girosite-info....

Exhibit 2:

Image

Another ** pavé. And street view confirms. There is pavé. Around 300 meters. Easy city pavé. With a non-pavé band. At times 2 non-pavé bands. So... clearly should be no pavé for us. Even without the band (which makes it 0 pavé anyway, regardless of length) it's *, considering the length 0. Here the Giro organization wrote in the description: "breve tratto di pavé"... but better check how short. And how hard. ** is very very clearly wrong here. Completely wrong.


So: Gipfel is a bad designer, let's insult him. Due to his sloppy work actually today's stage might change considerably, a 2** pavé before a climb? A single climber ending up behind the second climber of a team with 2 climbers? Will potentially cost energy, thus time. Very bad. So, down with Gipfel! Right? Right????

No, wrong. Well, partly, down with him, yeah, but not only.

Why did nobody check, he posted it early enough. RKL/Donkey as calendar assistant, isn't that his job? Actually not really, no, not his job to check every race, but while of course others had as much reason to check, let's concentrate on the Donkey. At least he's interesting.

The Donkey didn't check because....
a)
Robyklebt wrote:
Mon Apr 25, 2022 5:15 pm

Any complaints about the Giro design? (I don't have the energy to check, even if I'm sure I would have stuff to complain about)
b) He was planning to make a point, which he's doing now... He didn't check, but was sure that Gipfel would as usual ignore the Giro climb infos, at least at times, for reasons that are a bit a mystery to me he does that every year... Why ignore such a great source? So knew I was going to have something to argue later on...

Back to a)
The Donkey didn't have the energy. Poor weak whiny Donkey. Yeah...
Since the Donkey took over the job as "calendar assistant" in late 2017 I think, he has been designing more and more 1 day races. Right now it's at 100%. Earlier occasionally we would get somebody that would design a one day race, this year not, and I'm pretty sure last year neither. 2020 possibly? Yes, but it's your job Donkey, don't whine!
Actually, it's NOT my job.

The job is:
- Send 1 or multiple calendar proposals to Luques.
- Keep track of the suggestions in the forum
- Send and updated proposal to Luques
- Put the races online

You could add:
-Organize the designing. Make sure everything is designed.
I intereprete that as. Design as a normal designer, but do the leftovers too. But for the last x years the leftovers has been... every single one day race. And quite a lot of tours too.
This year we've had Gipfel designing all stage races in February and the whole Giro. Excellent job, thanks. OF course Gipfel should be the last one to help me designing, he has a more important job nowadays. Work on the react conversion.

Now I don't even mind designing a lot, although every single one day race... that's a bit too much. But ok. But what makes it worse this year is: WE have no more sprint fantasy races. And..... yes, you guessed it, almost nobody is designing them. Hansa and Falkenbier did fantasy races this year so far. And Big Donkey. Who has been left designing flat(tish) races regularly because otherwise we simply wouldn't have them for the calendar.

So, that's why the Donkey didn't check. He simply spends too much time checking if a race has a different route this year, then designing it, then designing 2 sprint races because we need them. Not in the mood to spend another hour checking Gipfel's Giro design. (Which in general of course is good, his refusal to use the Giro source (or at least not always) is puzzling, his addition of pavé this year a bit surprising, but in general good. But yes, the Donkey still should have checked, he didn't. So, Down with the Donkey! Right! Right?

No... actually it's down with the rest of you. Because it seems to be a case of: Nobody gives a fuck.

Good.

Planned this as a nice August surprise, but can say it now. From August on the calendar will change. Since nobody bothers designing, from August on we will have a maximum of 10 real races in the calendar. In August + the Vuelta. Which I can help design if necessary, but won't design if others do it.
For the rest, 10 stages, sorry, not races. So for sure either Benelux or Poland won't be in the calendar. Maybe neither. Neither Plouay nor Hamburg will, don't enjoy designing those too, will choose 10 others. Not design means no checking if there's a route change either. I choose my 10 races, I send the preview to Luques or post it in the forum, then design or check those 10 races. (A number that still can change)
You really really want a category 5 race like Plouay in the calendar? Easy. You check. A good thorough check takes 3-5'. Not much (why don't you do it Donks? Well, if it involves checking 20+ races, as sometimes happens, that's 1h to 1h40'), so everybody should be able to do it. Everybody that cares... Then if nothing changed, you write that in the forum and I will add it to the preview and put it online (if it's early enough) If it changed, you design it. Or if you can't, find somebody else to do it, since not many people have access to the editor anymore, some password bug. Can't find anybody? My turn to give a fuck, I design my 10 races nothing more. I will check your designed races and if they are too bad, sorry, no, refuse to put that online.

Harsh Donkey? Yes, but after most people didn't care at all for years now... good job, we won't continue like that, I do my job (calendar assistant, not designer), your turn to work. See May calendar, it's mentioned what is missing, as I have regularly over the years, it's being ignored.. ok, as you like, I might go down to 5 races until August, I might go up again, depends on the amount of designing done for May/June/July and the stupidity of the reactions here....
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!

Gipfelstuermer
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:43 am
Location: Weltenbummler
Contact:

Re: Giro 2022

Post by Gipfelstuermer » Tue May 10, 2022 5:00 pm

Street View (and TV pictures) says more than 1000 words.

Biancavilla

Cogne

In general, I'd like to motivate people to participate in design and calendar organization, so I prefer a healthy discussion ahead of the race rather than false accusations in hindsight.
GIP MASTERPLAN
Gameplay: Flexible Min-Tact. Improve Sprint System. Windkante.
Marketing: Re-attract old players. Advertisement. Social Media.
New Players: Fair Start Budget, New Tutorial.
Fairplay: Improve FPC features, Fair Prize Money Disribution.

Robyklebt
Posts: 10012
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Giro 2022

Post by Robyklebt » Tue May 10, 2022 5:22 pm

On Cogne, as I said, there are roughly 300 meters of pavé. With one band in the middle, sometimes 2? So Cogne is not a wrong accusation but correct.

It shouldn't be a **

On Biancavilla: Are you sure they passed there? As I said, I'm not completely sure where we pass. If it's the center road (not this one) then it's 1,2 km (+/-) easy pavé. For me 0, but * ok.
If it's like la flamme rouge goes, it's no pavé
If it's first the center road, then turn right and this one (which I considered unlikely when checking), then ok, that would be a **. Can anybody confirm if they passed that road or not?
Plus how did you get the idea that it would pass there? Not accusing, asking, because I read nothing indicating pavé at all on that stage.

Healthy discussion... then read the whole post and healthily inform me of which accusation are unjust. I'll retract them and apologize (but won't expect an apology for the wrong "false accusation" regarding Cogne. If that's a ** (+/-300 meters) then everything in RVV is a *****

But you missed the main point of the post anyway.... it has little to do with you, more with the lack of designing, lack of checking, which only made the IMO wrong parts in your design make it into the race. You're to blame for the design, I'm to blame for not checking, EVERYBODY else is to blame MORE than either of us.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!

Gipfelstuermer
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:43 am
Location: Weltenbummler
Contact:

Re: Giro 2022

Post by Gipfelstuermer » Tue May 10, 2022 6:48 pm

They went through Via Vittorio Emanuele, Piazza Cavour and then Via dottore Antonio Portale. The TV coverage confirmed that pavé stretch (even if I did not pay 100% attention I am very certain I saw the pavé). Regarding your confusion with la-flamme-rouge, they change the route if they have new information, we all know that and sometimes they don't have the right information. In the end, RCS can change the route any day.
Robyklebt wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 5:22 pm
You're to blame for the design, I'm to blame for not checking, EVERYBODY else is to blame MORE than either of us.
All your blaming is destructive for this game. Instead of blaming, try praising. Nobody is going to contribute if all they can expect is blaming game. So instead, we should praise designers for finding the right routes AHEAD of the race, which some people struggle with even AFTER the race has passed. It could work miracles and you'd have more people contributing here!
GIP MASTERPLAN
Gameplay: Flexible Min-Tact. Improve Sprint System. Windkante.
Marketing: Re-attract old players. Advertisement. Social Media.
New Players: Fair Start Budget, New Tutorial.
Fairplay: Improve FPC features, Fair Prize Money Disribution.

Robyklebt
Posts: 10012
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:50 pm
Contact:

Re: Giro 2022

Post by Robyklebt » Tue May 10, 2022 7:49 pm

Gipfelstuermer wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 6:48 pm
So instead, we should praise designers for finding the right routes AHEAD of the race, which some people struggle with even AFTER the race has passed. It could work miracles and you'd have more people contributing here!
Preaching water while drinking wine are we? Instead of praising me for caring, you attack me. Which is very destructive. I'm told. :lol:

Btw, there are no designers to praise. Only myself and you. So you praise me and I praise you? Or we each praise ourselves? Should we start now? I'm fantastic! Gipfel is fantastic. Your turn. I'd also like to be praised for pointing out that +/- 300 meters of pavé in Cogne with a band in the middle, as you confirmed with a picture, shouldn't be a **. It helps you designing even better in the future! (EVEN!) I'll praise all other designers too, once they are designing!
Gipfelstuermer wrote:
Tue May 10, 2022 6:48 pm
by Gipfelstuermer » 11 May 2022, 01:48
They went through Via Vittorio Emanuele, Piazza Cavour and then Via dottore Antonio Portale.
Without checking again, Vittorio Emanuele yes, I can see, seems very likely. That's the road with 1200 meters of "EASY" pavé I mentioned in my first post. I noticed you didn't praise me for mentioning that and being correct on there being pavé! And correct on classifying it as * max as well. Piazza Cavour is probably the one with the church? Pretty early on, then the pavé until then is maybe around half? 600 meters? Or so. It's 1200 if we go through to the end. Portale I have big doubts. the intermediate seems to have been in Viale Colombo, coming from northwest (you have PN with more details), which makes Portale rather unlikely. Would come from south. Could do a weird parcours through the village to come from the northwest, then 2 km easily possible, or an easier detour, but then it would never be 2 km of pavé. 1 and little rest, we had 2 (I assume the 7** was coming from the km leading to the intermediate where putting pavé would make a bug?) After there is no pavé, on that by now I'm sure.

Anyway, the point is to praise people. For the excellent calendar we risk having from August on. I trust you will join the praise of my 10 races a month designing strategy. Right?
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!

Gipfelstuermer
Posts: 1527
Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:43 am
Location: Weltenbummler
Contact:

Re: Giro 2022

Post by Gipfelstuermer » Tue May 10, 2022 8:15 pm

Yes I'll still praise you for 10 designs per month because that's 10 more than most others. And I will not blame you for errors even if you put asphalt on the Koppenberg... because in the end, if nobody checks and nobody else designs, how can I blame you?

So I will respond to your PN and perhaps then we can put the Kriegsbeil into the grave and smoke a Friedenspfeife together.
GIP MASTERPLAN
Gameplay: Flexible Min-Tact. Improve Sprint System. Windkante.
Marketing: Re-attract old players. Advertisement. Social Media.
New Players: Fair Start Budget, New Tutorial.
Fairplay: Improve FPC features, Fair Prize Money Disribution.

Bear
Posts: 1315
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:59 pm
Contact:

Re: Giro 2022

Post by Bear » Tue May 10, 2022 9:10 pm

Dont read everything here. Unfortunately not enough time as for designing and checking. But I think we all have to thank you both for all your work.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests