Classiques Belges
Moderators: systemmods, Calendarmods
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:47 pm
- Location: Liège, Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Classiques Belges
I was informed about it but i cannot resolve the problem. It seem that it was not an error from me but a "bug" (no cobbles with a mountain sprint in the same km?).
I think it's beter to put the sprint one km later to keep the real sprints in our races. But leso, make as you want. As you think it's the best. I finish the Ronde van Vlaanderen tomorrow.
I am active ol, but it's a big job to make all these races! I must make the Gold Race, Flèche Wallonne and LBL after, but I have to make my real life too. Don't worry, i make my best!
I think it's beter to put the sprint one km later to keep the real sprints in our races. But leso, make as you want. As you think it's the best. I finish the Ronde van Vlaanderen tomorrow.
I am active ol, but it's a big job to make all these races! I must make the Gold Race, Flèche Wallonne and LBL after, but I have to make my real life too. Don't worry, i make my best!
VC Aywaille
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
Re: Classiques Belges
I think too. GPM by De Panne is not a big challenge.Luna wrote:GPM out. That 4 points are not so important, I guess.
GPM out.
Re: Classiques Belges
Could be that we have the same problem in the first stage as well, don't know, didn't check, but seems possible.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: Classiques Belges
Oh dear. Yes, that looks quite probable. Bad organizers. It should be forbidden to place mountain prizes on top of Hellingen.
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:47 pm
- Location: Liège, Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Classiques Belges
Next job now:
- Amstel Gold Race
- Flèche Wallonne
- Lièbe - Bastogne - Liège
- Amstel Gold Race
- Flèche Wallonne
- Lièbe - Bastogne - Liège
VC Aywaille
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
Re: Classiques Belges
Kappelmuur:
306
We had it at 408 in Het Volk. It's the same as muur von gerardsbergen, no? So why do we have it at 306 now all of the sudden?
306
We had it at 408 in Het Volk. It's the same as muur von gerardsbergen, no? So why do we have it at 306 now all of the sudden?
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: Classiques Belges
Why do you draw the races?As far as the course hasn't changed, why not use the 09 version? In fact we made our form-planning because of this profiles.
J-Czucz hype train
Re: Classiques Belges
The course has changed
Re: Classiques Belges
Flandern yes. But Amstel, LBL and Fleche also? I know that redoute is missing this year...probably would be enough to draw this part new...and not the whole race. Otherwise it finally ends up in a 4 or in a 6 what would change the race-character completely...
J-Czucz hype train
Re: Classiques Belges
Fancy voodoo magic has made the Berendries disappear. Where is it? I hope it can be found until Sunday. Hopefully between Km 225 and 236.
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:47 pm
- Location: Liège, Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Classiques Belges
Quick, when you see iBan + VC Aywaille on a race, it's the 2009 profile with the mountains and pavés update (correct word?) to have a continuation during the 2010 flandrian season. Most of these races are not verry different.
For the Ronde, it change this year, so it was necessary to make a new profile. Paris - Roubaix, we keep the 2009 version.
Maybe i make an error with the Muur, but it's too late i think: lesossies is on hollidays! Bah, i can make an miserable error!
For Amstel, Flèche and Liège, i make it because leso ask me to make it. Simply like this. But if there is no difference, i don't change it! We already have a nice collaboration next year for these races (if i good remember).
And La Redoute is not missing this year! Did you want i make a cardiac-attack?
For the Ronde, it change this year, so it was necessary to make a new profile. Paris - Roubaix, we keep the 2009 version.
Maybe i make an error with the Muur, but it's too late i think: lesossies is on hollidays! Bah, i can make an miserable error!
For Amstel, Flèche and Liège, i make it because leso ask me to make it. Simply like this. But if there is no difference, i don't change it! We already have a nice collaboration next year for these races (if i good remember).
And La Redoute is not missing this year! Did you want i make a cardiac-attack?
VC Aywaille
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:47 pm
- Location: Liège, Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Classiques Belges
25. Berendries (berg)iBanesto wrote:Fancy voodoo magic has made the Berendries disappear. Where is it? I hope it can be found until Sunday. Hopefully between Km 225 and 236.
940m long (average: 7%, max.: 12,3%)
km: 229
RSF 2010: 7
Like in Het Nieuwsblad
Where is my Berendries? I make allthe difficulties first, to be sure i don't forget it. Maybe it's a problem when i check it after making, or i make a mistake. I try to call lesossies!
VC Aywaille
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
Re: Classiques Belges
OK Aywaille I look after it and correct it.
Nos stress please.
Nos stress please.
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:47 pm
- Location: Liège, Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Classiques Belges
Thank you leso, you are the right people in the right place!
I just stress a little (hmmm beter to say that i never stress) because i want to make it correctly for all the managers. Thank you and sorry again.
And thank you all to see my errors!
I just stress a little (hmmm beter to say that i never stress) because i want to make it correctly for all the managers. Thank you and sorry again.
And thank you all to see my errors!
VC Aywaille
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
Re: Classiques Belges
I know it
The "monuments" stress is heavy but take it easy.
I stay behind you.
The "monuments" stress is heavy but take it easy.
I stay behind you.
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:47 pm
- Location: Liège, Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Classiques Belges
Thank you leso.
More time for my next profiles. I think all can be ok.
More time for my next profiles. I think all can be ok.
VC Aywaille
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
Re: Classiques Belges
Muur changed to 308 -> 8% 3*Robyklebt wrote:Kappelmuur:
306
We had it at 408 in Het Volk. It's the same as muur von gerardsbergen, no? So why do we have it at 306 now all of the sudden?
Pavés not so heavy 3* OK
Berendries changed too
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:47 pm
- Location: Liège, Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Classiques Belges
Here the informations about the Amstel Gold Race:
(euh, i know that the Amstel is in the Netherlands, but i don't want to make a topic for only this race. And of course the race come a little in Belgium, around Gemmenich)
1. Maasberg (km 10,7)
Gemeente : elsloo
Vanuit : elsloo
Hoogte : 62 m.
Lengte : 500 m.
Hoogteverschil : 22 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.4 %
RSF 2010: 4%
2. Adsteeg (km 30,5)
Gemeente : Beek
Vanuit : Beek
Hoogte : 112 m.
Lengte : 500 m.
Hoogteverschil : 27 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5.4 %
RSF 2010: 5%
3. Lange Raarberg (km 37,5)
Gemeente : Meerssen
Vanuit : Meerssen
Hoogte : 124 m.
Lengte : 1300 m.
Hoogteverschil : 59 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.5 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 3%
4. Bergseweg (km 54,1)
Gemeente : Voerendaal
Vanuit : Voerendaal
Hoogte : 180 m.
Lengte : 2700 m.
Hoogteverschil : 90 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 3.3 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 2% / 2%
5. Sibbergrubbe (km 66,0)
Gemeente : Valkenburg aan de Geul
Vanuit : Valkenburg
Hoogte : 145 m.
Lengte : 2100 m.
Hoogteverschil : 87 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.1 %
RSF 2010: 4% / 5%
6. Cauberg (km 71,4)
Gemeente : Valkenburg aan de Geul
Vanuit : Valkenburg
Hoogte : 137 m.
Lengte : 1200 m.
Hoogteverschil : 69 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5.8 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 2%
7. Wolfsberg (km 92,6)
Gemeente : Noorbeek
Vanuit : Noorbeek
Hoogte : 191 m.
Lengte : 800 m.
Hoogteverschil : 35 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.4 %
RSF 2010: 4%
8. Loorberg (km 98,2)
Gemeente : Slenaken
Vanuit : Slenaken
Hoogte : 225 m.
Lengte : 1500 m.
Hoogteverschil : 83 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5.5 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 4%
9. Schweibergerweg (km 108,3)
Gemeente : Gulpen
Vanuit : Schweiberg
Hoogte : 220 m.
Lengte : 2900 m.
Hoogteverschil : 114 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 3.9 %
RSF 2010: 5% / 3% / 3%
10. Camerig (km 114,7)
Gemeente : Vijlen
Vanuit : Epen
Hoogte : 281 m.
Lengte : 4300 m.
Hoogteverschil : 163 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 3.8 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 4% / 3% / 4% / 2%
11. Drielandenpunt (km 127,7)
Gemeente : Vaals
Vanuit : Vaals
Hoogte : 321 m.
Lengte : 3700 m.
Hoogteverschil : 142 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 3.8 %
RSF 2010: 5% / 5% / 4% / 2%
12. Gemmenich (km 130,5)
Gemeente : Blieberg
Vanuit : Gemmenich
Hoogte : 273 m.
Lengte : 900 m.
Hoogteverschil : 58 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 6.4 %
RSF 2010: 6%
13. Vijlenerbos (km 134)
Gemeente : Vaals
Vanuit : Vaals
Hoogte : 269 m.
Lengte : 1800 m.
Hoogteverschil : 92 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5.1 %
RSF 2010: 4% / 6%
14. Eperheide (km 143,8)
Gemeente : Gulpen-Wittem
Vanuit : Epen
Hoogte : 225 m.
Lengte : 2300 m.
Hoogteverschil : 103 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.5 %
RSF 2010: 5% / 4% / 2%
15. Gulpenerberg (km 151,8)
Gemeente : Gulpen-Wittem
Vanuit : Partij
Hoogte : 153 m.
Lengte : 700 m.
Hoogteverschil : 57 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 8.1 %
RSF 2010: 8%
16. van Plettenbergweg (km 155,4)
Gemeente : Eys
Vanuit : Wittem
Hoogte : 141 m.
Lengte : 1000 m.
Hoogteverschil : 42 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.2 %
RSF 2010: 4%
17. Eyserbosweg (km 157,2)
Gemeente : Gulpen-Wittem
Vanuit : Eijs
Hoogte : 187 m.
Lengte : 1100 m.
Hoogteverschil : 89 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 8.1 %
RSF 2010: 8%
18. St. Remigiusstraat (km 163,1)
Gemeente : Simpelveld
Vanuit : Simpelveld
Hoogte : 214 m.
Lengte : 1000 m.
Hoogteverschil : 77 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 7.7 %
RSF 2010: 8%
19. Vrakelberg (km 168,5)
Gemeente : Voerendaal
Vanuit : Ubachsberg
Hoogte : 178 m.
Lengte : 700 m.
Hoogteverschil : 55 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 7.9 %
RSF 2010: 7%
20. Sibbergrubbe (km 176,4)
Gemeente : Valkenburg aan de Geul
Vanuit : Valkenburg
Hoogte : 145 m.
Lengte : 2100 m.
Hoogteverschil : 87 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.1 %
RSF 2010: 4% / 5%
21. Cauberg (km 181,9)
Gemeente : Valkenburg aan de Geul
Vanuit : Valkenburg
Hoogte : 137 m.
Lengte : 1200 m.
Hoogteverschil : 69 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5.8 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 2%
22. Geulhemmerweg (km 185,4)
Gemeente : Valkenburg aan de Geul
Vanuit : Geulle
Hoogte : 126 m.
Lengte : 1000 m.
Hoogteverschil : 62 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 6.2 %
RSF 2010: 6%
23. Bemelerberg (km 198,2)
Gemeente : Margraten
Vanuit : Bemelen
Hoogte : 127 m.
Lengte : 900 m.
Hoogteverschil : 45 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5 %
RSF 2010: 5%
24. Wolfsberg (km 215,3)
Gemeente : Noorbeek
Vanuit : Noorbeek
Hoogte : 191 m.
Lengte : 800 m.
Hoogteverschil : 35 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.4 %
RSF 2010: 4%
25. Loorberg (km 220,9)
Gemeente : Slenaken
Vanuit : Slenaken
Hoogte : 225 m.
Lengte : 1500 m.
Hoogteverschil : 83 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5.5 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 4%
26. Gulpenerberg (km 229,2)
Gemeente : Gulpen-Wittem
Vanuit : Partij
Hoogte : 153 m.
Lengte : 700 m.
Hoogteverschil : 57 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 8.1 %
RSF 2010: 8%
27. Kruisberg (km 234,7)
Gemeente : Eijs
Vanuit : Wahlwiller
Hoogte : 162 m.
Lengte : 800 m.
Hoogteverschil : 60 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 7.5 %
RSF 2010: 7%
28. Eyserbosweg (km 236,8)
Gemeente : Gulpen-Wittem
Vanuit : Eijs
Hoogte : 187 m.
Lengte : 1100 m.
Hoogteverschil : 89 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 8.1 %
RSF 2010: 8%
29. Fromberg (km 240,5)
Gemeente : Voerendaal
Vanuit : Ubachsberg
Hoogte : 166 m.
Lengte : 1600 m.
Hoogteverschil : 64 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4 %
RSF 2010: 4% / 3%
30. Keutenberg (km 245,0)
Gemeente : Valkenburg aan de Geul
Vanuit : Schin op Geul
Hoogte : 136 m.
Lengte : 700 m.
Hoogteverschil : 66 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 9.4 %
RSF 2010: 9%
31. Cauberg (km 257,3)
Gemeente : Valkenburg aan de Geul
Vanuit : Valkenburg
Hoogte : 137 m.
Lengte : 1200 m.
Hoogteverschil : 69 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5.8 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 2%
(euh, i know that the Amstel is in the Netherlands, but i don't want to make a topic for only this race. And of course the race come a little in Belgium, around Gemmenich)
1. Maasberg (km 10,7)
Gemeente : elsloo
Vanuit : elsloo
Hoogte : 62 m.
Lengte : 500 m.
Hoogteverschil : 22 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.4 %
RSF 2010: 4%
2. Adsteeg (km 30,5)
Gemeente : Beek
Vanuit : Beek
Hoogte : 112 m.
Lengte : 500 m.
Hoogteverschil : 27 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5.4 %
RSF 2010: 5%
3. Lange Raarberg (km 37,5)
Gemeente : Meerssen
Vanuit : Meerssen
Hoogte : 124 m.
Lengte : 1300 m.
Hoogteverschil : 59 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.5 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 3%
4. Bergseweg (km 54,1)
Gemeente : Voerendaal
Vanuit : Voerendaal
Hoogte : 180 m.
Lengte : 2700 m.
Hoogteverschil : 90 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 3.3 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 2% / 2%
5. Sibbergrubbe (km 66,0)
Gemeente : Valkenburg aan de Geul
Vanuit : Valkenburg
Hoogte : 145 m.
Lengte : 2100 m.
Hoogteverschil : 87 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.1 %
RSF 2010: 4% / 5%
6. Cauberg (km 71,4)
Gemeente : Valkenburg aan de Geul
Vanuit : Valkenburg
Hoogte : 137 m.
Lengte : 1200 m.
Hoogteverschil : 69 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5.8 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 2%
7. Wolfsberg (km 92,6)
Gemeente : Noorbeek
Vanuit : Noorbeek
Hoogte : 191 m.
Lengte : 800 m.
Hoogteverschil : 35 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.4 %
RSF 2010: 4%
8. Loorberg (km 98,2)
Gemeente : Slenaken
Vanuit : Slenaken
Hoogte : 225 m.
Lengte : 1500 m.
Hoogteverschil : 83 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5.5 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 4%
9. Schweibergerweg (km 108,3)
Gemeente : Gulpen
Vanuit : Schweiberg
Hoogte : 220 m.
Lengte : 2900 m.
Hoogteverschil : 114 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 3.9 %
RSF 2010: 5% / 3% / 3%
10. Camerig (km 114,7)
Gemeente : Vijlen
Vanuit : Epen
Hoogte : 281 m.
Lengte : 4300 m.
Hoogteverschil : 163 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 3.8 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 4% / 3% / 4% / 2%
11. Drielandenpunt (km 127,7)
Gemeente : Vaals
Vanuit : Vaals
Hoogte : 321 m.
Lengte : 3700 m.
Hoogteverschil : 142 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 3.8 %
RSF 2010: 5% / 5% / 4% / 2%
12. Gemmenich (km 130,5)
Gemeente : Blieberg
Vanuit : Gemmenich
Hoogte : 273 m.
Lengte : 900 m.
Hoogteverschil : 58 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 6.4 %
RSF 2010: 6%
13. Vijlenerbos (km 134)
Gemeente : Vaals
Vanuit : Vaals
Hoogte : 269 m.
Lengte : 1800 m.
Hoogteverschil : 92 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5.1 %
RSF 2010: 4% / 6%
14. Eperheide (km 143,8)
Gemeente : Gulpen-Wittem
Vanuit : Epen
Hoogte : 225 m.
Lengte : 2300 m.
Hoogteverschil : 103 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.5 %
RSF 2010: 5% / 4% / 2%
15. Gulpenerberg (km 151,8)
Gemeente : Gulpen-Wittem
Vanuit : Partij
Hoogte : 153 m.
Lengte : 700 m.
Hoogteverschil : 57 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 8.1 %
RSF 2010: 8%
16. van Plettenbergweg (km 155,4)
Gemeente : Eys
Vanuit : Wittem
Hoogte : 141 m.
Lengte : 1000 m.
Hoogteverschil : 42 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.2 %
RSF 2010: 4%
17. Eyserbosweg (km 157,2)
Gemeente : Gulpen-Wittem
Vanuit : Eijs
Hoogte : 187 m.
Lengte : 1100 m.
Hoogteverschil : 89 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 8.1 %
RSF 2010: 8%
18. St. Remigiusstraat (km 163,1)
Gemeente : Simpelveld
Vanuit : Simpelveld
Hoogte : 214 m.
Lengte : 1000 m.
Hoogteverschil : 77 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 7.7 %
RSF 2010: 8%
19. Vrakelberg (km 168,5)
Gemeente : Voerendaal
Vanuit : Ubachsberg
Hoogte : 178 m.
Lengte : 700 m.
Hoogteverschil : 55 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 7.9 %
RSF 2010: 7%
20. Sibbergrubbe (km 176,4)
Gemeente : Valkenburg aan de Geul
Vanuit : Valkenburg
Hoogte : 145 m.
Lengte : 2100 m.
Hoogteverschil : 87 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.1 %
RSF 2010: 4% / 5%
21. Cauberg (km 181,9)
Gemeente : Valkenburg aan de Geul
Vanuit : Valkenburg
Hoogte : 137 m.
Lengte : 1200 m.
Hoogteverschil : 69 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5.8 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 2%
22. Geulhemmerweg (km 185,4)
Gemeente : Valkenburg aan de Geul
Vanuit : Geulle
Hoogte : 126 m.
Lengte : 1000 m.
Hoogteverschil : 62 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 6.2 %
RSF 2010: 6%
23. Bemelerberg (km 198,2)
Gemeente : Margraten
Vanuit : Bemelen
Hoogte : 127 m.
Lengte : 900 m.
Hoogteverschil : 45 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5 %
RSF 2010: 5%
24. Wolfsberg (km 215,3)
Gemeente : Noorbeek
Vanuit : Noorbeek
Hoogte : 191 m.
Lengte : 800 m.
Hoogteverschil : 35 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4.4 %
RSF 2010: 4%
25. Loorberg (km 220,9)
Gemeente : Slenaken
Vanuit : Slenaken
Hoogte : 225 m.
Lengte : 1500 m.
Hoogteverschil : 83 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5.5 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 4%
26. Gulpenerberg (km 229,2)
Gemeente : Gulpen-Wittem
Vanuit : Partij
Hoogte : 153 m.
Lengte : 700 m.
Hoogteverschil : 57 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 8.1 %
RSF 2010: 8%
27. Kruisberg (km 234,7)
Gemeente : Eijs
Vanuit : Wahlwiller
Hoogte : 162 m.
Lengte : 800 m.
Hoogteverschil : 60 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 7.5 %
RSF 2010: 7%
28. Eyserbosweg (km 236,8)
Gemeente : Gulpen-Wittem
Vanuit : Eijs
Hoogte : 187 m.
Lengte : 1100 m.
Hoogteverschil : 89 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 8.1 %
RSF 2010: 8%
29. Fromberg (km 240,5)
Gemeente : Voerendaal
Vanuit : Ubachsberg
Hoogte : 166 m.
Lengte : 1600 m.
Hoogteverschil : 64 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 4 %
RSF 2010: 4% / 3%
30. Keutenberg (km 245,0)
Gemeente : Valkenburg aan de Geul
Vanuit : Schin op Geul
Hoogte : 136 m.
Lengte : 700 m.
Hoogteverschil : 66 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 9.4 %
RSF 2010: 9%
31. Cauberg (km 257,3)
Gemeente : Valkenburg aan de Geul
Vanuit : Valkenburg
Hoogte : 137 m.
Lengte : 1200 m.
Hoogteverschil : 69 m.
Stijgingspercentage : 5.8 %
RSF 2010: 6% / 2%
VC Aywaille
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
-
- Posts: 356
- Joined: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:47 pm
- Location: Liège, Belgium
- Contact:
Re: Classiques Belges
Normally Gaurain make "La Fleche" and "Liege - Bastogne - Liège".
We will add the informations here after (for the coming years), or Gaurain will make it himself during his work.
We will add the informations here after (for the coming years), or Gaurain will make it himself during his work.
VC Aywaille
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
The team to beat
Il ne faut jamais juger les gens sur leurs fréquentations : Judas, par exemple, avait des amis irréprochables! (Verlaine)
Re: Classiques Belges
Het Volk 11
Pain in the ass, not over yet, but post the things I've done so people can complain.
Main sources
Het Volk homepage: For length etc.
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorie: ... elgi%C3%AB
http://rvv.be/fr/tourisme
And Aywailles work from 2010 see his posts in this thread.
Possible problems: The pavé seem to be rated fairly high. I really don't have a clue how they compare to Paris-Roubaix... 2 different organisers probably don't use the same scale. Could be that their 4 stars would be a 3 star in PR...
For the moment I just take the RVV rating. Other opinions would be very welcome though.
Pavé 1: Haaghoek:
2010: -202+202
2011:-401 400
More cobbles, source
http://rvv.be/fr/tourisme/pentes-et-pav ... 0/haaghoek
Flanders site, ok, Het Volk says 2000 meters, they say 1700m, but it's the same, they give it 4 stars, ok.
Change in % is just what my measurement gave.
Helling 1: Ten Bosse
450m long (average: 6,9%, max.: 8,7%)
km: 236
RSF 2010: 6
2011: copied from 2010
Helling 2: Guilleminlaan
2600 meters long, no other info
Seems to go up only 64 meters in those 2,6 Km
3-3-1 for me... strange that that qualifies as a helling, if somebody knows more enlighten me.
Helling 3 Eikenmolen
610m with an average of 5,9%
Max.: 12%
RSF 2010: 6
2011: 6
Helling 4: Kruisberg:
Change from Aywailles 10 version
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kruisberg_%28Ronse%29
http://rvv.be/fr/tourisme/pentes-et-pav ... /kruisberg
Here you see the version with pavé, Oudestraat or whatever it's called. Het Volk takes the newer road, no pavé. And the climb at the bottom different too, not from the city center but from the east. It's less steep. So
2011: 2-6
Pavé 2:
11. Donderij + Hof te Fiennestraat: First mystery according to their map they don't pass the second road... but ok, maybe the end of Donderij is called Hof bla bla.
800m + 300m
http://rvv.be/fr/tourisme/pentes-et-pav ... s/donderij
rated as 4. It's longer too 1500 a bit mysterious, but will stick to one Km.
2011: 402
Helling 5 Taaienberg
http://rvv.be/fr/tourisme/pentes-et-pav ... Taaienberg
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taaienberg
According to the Het Volk site 530 meters 6,6% which is actually what the rvv numbers give if you calculate them
Last year 6 and 2 pavé
2011: 206, the same.
Helling 6: Eikenberg
Get the links yourself
2011: 206, like 2010
Helling 7 Wolvenberg
2011: 8, like 2010
Pavé 3:
Holleweg
http://rvv.be/fr/tourisme/pentes-et-pav ... 1/Holleweg
IMO the other way around from here. And 2400 meters they say, so
2011: 401 -401 -202
2400 meters so I use the Skullmethod and give half the pavé for the next km.
Helling 8: Leberg
Same as 2010: 6%
Helling 9: Looking at the picture at the RVV Site, decided that was more than a * pavé. Even if it's only 300 meters long, the mountain itself is only 463 too, 7% average, keep it at 7, so don't cut the pavé too much. Could have gone for ***, but because it's not the full length of the climb went for **
RSF 2010 107
RSF 2011: 207
Pavé 4: Bostekrouterstraat 300 meters, Start Km 172.7 No mention about the state of the pavé, I assume it's *** why later
Pavé 5: Paddestraat: RVV link says 3, so be it. 2300 meters. Start 173.7, end 176. obviously
Pavé 6 Liphoovenstraat 1300 meters. *** according to STarts at 176.5, finishes 177.8
So.... all three individually would be fairly easy.
nr 1 *, only 300 meters, can assume it's a 3 like the ones close by.
nr 2 *, ***, *** 300 meters in one km, so 1, then 3
nr 3 either *, *** or **, **, 500 Meters of 3=1,5, 800 meters of 3=2,4, so both ok, I would go with * ***
But all three so closely together...
From km 173-178
reality- 700 meters unpaved-300 meters ***, 700 paved- 2300 ***- 500 paved 1300 *** - 200 paved. Total: 2100 meters no pavé, 3900 ***
RSF with above system: 2km * 2 km *** 1 km * 1 km ***
Good? Really no clue on this one, could make it in x different ways and none really is correct.
1. Like above
2 Put nr 4 one km earlier and/or nr 6 one km later to have 1 or 2 one Km breaks in between the sectors. (reality 700 +500 meters)
3 Combine the 300 from nr 4 with the 300 from nr 5 and make it a ** right before nr 5
4: Forget the Skullzmethod, make it * 1km nothing, *** **** nothing ***
5 Same as 4 but add the missing 600 meters as * star each in the 2 sectors
6 Roby reads the whole thing wrong and it's really easy.
No clue, opinions more than welcome. Actually I demand opinions here...
Finally did:
Ok, I finally did
the first * one km ahead. So now km 172 instead of -1 is -103, 173 is -1 instead of -103
Then 174 *-***-***-*-***
Pavé 7: lange Munte 2500 meters no info on the RVV site
Pics here:
http://koenwolk.wordpress.com/2010/02/2 ... nge-munte/
Comparing with pics from the rated sectors on the RVV I'd go with 3
RSF 2011:-201, 302, 300
Pavé 8: Steensomething. 700 meters in the city. 100 is closer to the goal than last year because now it's actually where it is. The pavé stops 1,7 or so km before the end of the stage. 2 at RSF, so 600 meters longer than in reality.
Pain in the ass, not over yet, but post the things I've done so people can complain.
Main sources
Het Volk homepage: For length etc.
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorie: ... elgi%C3%AB
http://rvv.be/fr/tourisme
And Aywailles work from 2010 see his posts in this thread.
Possible problems: The pavé seem to be rated fairly high. I really don't have a clue how they compare to Paris-Roubaix... 2 different organisers probably don't use the same scale. Could be that their 4 stars would be a 3 star in PR...
For the moment I just take the RVV rating. Other opinions would be very welcome though.
Pavé 1: Haaghoek:
2010: -202+202
2011:-401 400
More cobbles, source
http://rvv.be/fr/tourisme/pentes-et-pav ... 0/haaghoek
Flanders site, ok, Het Volk says 2000 meters, they say 1700m, but it's the same, they give it 4 stars, ok.
Change in % is just what my measurement gave.
Helling 1: Ten Bosse
450m long (average: 6,9%, max.: 8,7%)
km: 236
RSF 2010: 6
2011: copied from 2010
Helling 2: Guilleminlaan
2600 meters long, no other info
Seems to go up only 64 meters in those 2,6 Km
3-3-1 for me... strange that that qualifies as a helling, if somebody knows more enlighten me.
Helling 3 Eikenmolen
610m with an average of 5,9%
Max.: 12%
RSF 2010: 6
2011: 6
Helling 4: Kruisberg:
Change from Aywailles 10 version
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kruisberg_%28Ronse%29
http://rvv.be/fr/tourisme/pentes-et-pav ... /kruisberg
Here you see the version with pavé, Oudestraat or whatever it's called. Het Volk takes the newer road, no pavé. And the climb at the bottom different too, not from the city center but from the east. It's less steep. So
2011: 2-6
Pavé 2:
11. Donderij + Hof te Fiennestraat: First mystery according to their map they don't pass the second road... but ok, maybe the end of Donderij is called Hof bla bla.
800m + 300m
http://rvv.be/fr/tourisme/pentes-et-pav ... s/donderij
rated as 4. It's longer too 1500 a bit mysterious, but will stick to one Km.
2011: 402
Helling 5 Taaienberg
http://rvv.be/fr/tourisme/pentes-et-pav ... Taaienberg
http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taaienberg
According to the Het Volk site 530 meters 6,6% which is actually what the rvv numbers give if you calculate them
Last year 6 and 2 pavé
2011: 206, the same.
Helling 6: Eikenberg
Get the links yourself
2011: 206, like 2010
Helling 7 Wolvenberg
2011: 8, like 2010
Pavé 3:
Holleweg
http://rvv.be/fr/tourisme/pentes-et-pav ... 1/Holleweg
IMO the other way around from here. And 2400 meters they say, so
2011: 401 -401 -202
2400 meters so I use the Skullmethod and give half the pavé for the next km.
Helling 8: Leberg
Same as 2010: 6%
Helling 9: Looking at the picture at the RVV Site, decided that was more than a * pavé. Even if it's only 300 meters long, the mountain itself is only 463 too, 7% average, keep it at 7, so don't cut the pavé too much. Could have gone for ***, but because it's not the full length of the climb went for **
RSF 2010 107
RSF 2011: 207
Pavé 4: Bostekrouterstraat 300 meters, Start Km 172.7 No mention about the state of the pavé, I assume it's *** why later
Pavé 5: Paddestraat: RVV link says 3, so be it. 2300 meters. Start 173.7, end 176. obviously
Pavé 6 Liphoovenstraat 1300 meters. *** according to STarts at 176.5, finishes 177.8
So.... all three individually would be fairly easy.
nr 1 *, only 300 meters, can assume it's a 3 like the ones close by.
nr 2 *, ***, *** 300 meters in one km, so 1, then 3
nr 3 either *, *** or **, **, 500 Meters of 3=1,5, 800 meters of 3=2,4, so both ok, I would go with * ***
But all three so closely together...
From km 173-178
reality- 700 meters unpaved-300 meters ***, 700 paved- 2300 ***- 500 paved 1300 *** - 200 paved. Total: 2100 meters no pavé, 3900 ***
RSF with above system: 2km * 2 km *** 1 km * 1 km ***
Good? Really no clue on this one, could make it in x different ways and none really is correct.
1. Like above
2 Put nr 4 one km earlier and/or nr 6 one km later to have 1 or 2 one Km breaks in between the sectors. (reality 700 +500 meters)
3 Combine the 300 from nr 4 with the 300 from nr 5 and make it a ** right before nr 5
4: Forget the Skullzmethod, make it * 1km nothing, *** **** nothing ***
5 Same as 4 but add the missing 600 meters as * star each in the 2 sectors
6 Roby reads the whole thing wrong and it's really easy.
No clue, opinions more than welcome. Actually I demand opinions here...
Finally did:
Ok, I finally did
the first * one km ahead. So now km 172 instead of -1 is -103, 173 is -1 instead of -103
Then 174 *-***-***-*-***
Pavé 7: lange Munte 2500 meters no info on the RVV site
Pics here:
http://koenwolk.wordpress.com/2010/02/2 ... nge-munte/
Comparing with pics from the rated sectors on the RVV I'd go with 3
RSF 2011:-201, 302, 300
Pavé 8: Steensomething. 700 meters in the city. 100 is closer to the goal than last year because now it's actually where it is. The pavé stops 1,7 or so km before the end of the stage. 2 at RSF, so 600 meters longer than in reality.
Last edited by Robyklebt on Mon Feb 14, 2011 6:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: Classiques Belges
* / * / *** / *** / * / *** Sounds good no ? Ok one break for the 700m would be nice too
Also, you could try to rearrange the kms. Forget the first 700 unpaved meters if there are several undecisive kms before them.
Or the first 200, which makes: 500 unpaved - 300 *** - 200 unpaved / 500 unpaved - 500 *** / 1000 *** / 800 *** - 200 unpaved / 300 unpaved -700 *** / 600 *** - 200+ unpaved */ **/ ***/ **(*)/ **/ **
A more straightforward solution: put every sector into the profile independently:
300 at *** + 700 unpaved = *
Paddestraat Adaptation RSF 2010: 201 / -203
One km with * for the transition
Lippenhovenstraat Adaptation RSF 2010: 301
Only 5 kms though, but I guess that's because they dont start at km xxx.00
Ok, maybe i'm just writing crap... Good luck.
Imo the RSF result is more important than to follow reality on every inch of the road, which is almost impossible.
Also, you could try to rearrange the kms. Forget the first 700 unpaved meters if there are several undecisive kms before them.
Or the first 200, which makes: 500 unpaved - 300 *** - 200 unpaved / 500 unpaved - 500 *** / 1000 *** / 800 *** - 200 unpaved / 300 unpaved -700 *** / 600 *** - 200+ unpaved */ **/ ***/ **(*)/ **/ **
A more straightforward solution: put every sector into the profile independently:
300 at *** + 700 unpaved = *
Paddestraat Adaptation RSF 2010: 201 / -203
One km with * for the transition
Lippenhovenstraat Adaptation RSF 2010: 301
Only 5 kms though, but I guess that's because they dont start at km xxx.00
Ok, maybe i'm just writing crap... Good luck.
Imo the RSF result is more important than to follow reality on every inch of the road, which is almost impossible.
Qui sème le vent récolte le tempo...
Re: Classiques Belges
Ok, I finally did
the first * one km ahead. So now km 172 instead of -1 is -103
Then 174 *-***-***-*-***
Lange Munte went for **-***-*** finally, thanks to NoPiks suggestions not to make it too easy using the skull method, 500 meters at ***, 1 Km * would have been too easy.
Thanks to NoPik for the help!
Complaints now still welcome, but insults can be expected in the answers as well, you could have complained before!
the first * one km ahead. So now km 172 instead of -1 is -103
Then 174 *-***-***-*-***
Lange Munte went for **-***-*** finally, thanks to NoPiks suggestions not to make it too easy using the skull method, 500 meters at ***, 1 Km * would have been too easy.
Thanks to NoPik for the help!
Complaints now still welcome, but insults can be expected in the answers as well, you could have complained before!
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: Classiques Belges
Since I seem to have been elected by general silence to do this... ok.
Dwars door Vlanderen 2011
Here the hellingen from 2011 and how I did them. Only change worth noting probably the Oude Kwaremont, from 306 304 to 306 303. Like it better.
Will later add Aywailles numbers from 2010 and iBans from 2009 (when available) for comparison later. Complaints and corrections welcome.
Nieuwe Kwaremont 5 4
Katteberg 206
Leberg 6
Valkenberg 6
Eikenberg 206
Steenbekkendries 303
Knokteberg/Cote de Trieu 7
Oude Kwaremont 306 303
Paterberg 206
Tiegemberg 5
Holstraat 5
Nokereberg 204
Will do Nokere Koerse next.
Dwars door Vlanderen 2011
Here the hellingen from 2011 and how I did them. Only change worth noting probably the Oude Kwaremont, from 306 304 to 306 303. Like it better.
Will later add Aywailles numbers from 2010 and iBans from 2009 (when available) for comparison later. Complaints and corrections welcome.
Nieuwe Kwaremont 5 4
Katteberg 206
Leberg 6
Valkenberg 6
Eikenberg 206
Steenbekkendries 303
Knokteberg/Cote de Trieu 7
Oude Kwaremont 306 303
Paterberg 206
Tiegemberg 5
Holstraat 5
Nokereberg 204
Will do Nokere Koerse next.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: Classiques Belges
a clear vote.Robyklebt wrote:Since I seem to have been elected by general silence to do this... ok.
thanks for your work
Re: Classiques Belges
Nokere Koerse
Kruisberg 2 6
Hotond 4 (but it's not the climb from the bottom)
Kluisberg 7
Tiegemberg 5
Nokereberg 204
Think nothing changed, Kruisberg the non pavéroute again like in Het Volk, different approach, but in the end comes to the same 2 6
Next E3
Kruisberg 2 6
Hotond 4 (but it's not the climb from the bottom)
Kluisberg 7
Tiegemberg 5
Nokereberg 204
Think nothing changed, Kruisberg the non pavéroute again like in Het Volk, different approach, but in the end comes to the same 2 6
Next E3
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests