Tour 2017
Moderators: systemmods, Calendarmods
-
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 5:39 pm
- Contact:
Tour 2017
mintact km 1
mintact km 182
mintact km 189
mintact km 199
mintact km 140
mintact km 207
mintact km 205
mintact km 167
mintact km 143
mintact km 169
mintact km 195
mintact km 173
mintact km 66
mintact km 167
mintact km 171
mintact km 140
mintact km 138
mintact km 150
mintact km 214
mintact km 1
mintact km 85
Re: Tour 2017
Well, it's apparently work in progress.
When I find some time, I can help checking the stages for correctness (tunnels, important climbs, etc.)
When I find some time, I can help checking the stages for correctness (tunnels, important climbs, etc.)
Re: Tour 2017
And make sure that the min-tact is set reasonably and not just randomly as it was often the case for the Giro.
I didn't mean to say it. But I meant what I said.
Re: Tour 2017
This is something I can easily change even when it is already online and running in case (obviously always better to have all ready and nice ).team fl wrote:And make sure that the min-tact is set reasonably and not just randomly as it was often the case for the Giro.
- Pokemon Club
- Posts: 3185
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:37 pm
- Contact:
Re: Tour 2017
And please put the name of the tour for all stagesluques wrote:This is something I can easily change even when it is already online and running in case (obviously always better to have all ready and nice ).team fl wrote:And make sure that the min-tact is set reasonably and not just randomly as it was often the case for the Giro.
- Pokemon Club
- Posts: 3185
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:37 pm
- Contact:
Re: Tour 2017
I compared the RSF profiles with the ones on the official website:
- stage 3, 8km missing somewhere, last 3km, should be more like 0-7-5
- stage 7: flat last km on website, +1 in RSF
- stage 12:
- last descent is 2,5 km on website, only 1km in RSF
- last climb is 2,4 km with 8,4%, the last 400m being really steep (13%), so 6% for the last km is too easy, I guess. But hard to say, what would be a good solution
- stage 13:
- Agnes: steadier on website than in RSF (4 times 10+ in RSF, only 1 on website)
- Mur de Péguère: last 3,3 km are very steep on website, last km is a bit flat in RSF (because of x,3km in total, I guess), but better make a correction at the beginning of the climb
- stage 14: last km has 570m with 9,6%, so 5% looks too easy. I'd say 6% or 7% would fit better
- stage 15: last km on website looks wrong (completely flat, 10m difference), so no idea what it's actually like
... to be continued ...
- stage 3, 8km missing somewhere, last 3km, should be more like 0-7-5
- stage 7: flat last km on website, +1 in RSF
- stage 12:
- last descent is 2,5 km on website, only 1km in RSF
- last climb is 2,4 km with 8,4%, the last 400m being really steep (13%), so 6% for the last km is too easy, I guess. But hard to say, what would be a good solution
- stage 13:
- Agnes: steadier on website than in RSF (4 times 10+ in RSF, only 1 on website)
- Mur de Péguère: last 3,3 km are very steep on website, last km is a bit flat in RSF (because of x,3km in total, I guess), but better make a correction at the beginning of the climb
- stage 14: last km has 570m with 9,6%, so 5% looks too easy. I'd say 6% or 7% would fit better
- stage 15: last km on website looks wrong (completely flat, 10m difference), so no idea what it's actually like
... to be continued ...
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests