cycling4freaks.com

Pokemon Club wrote: ↑

Sat Dec 23, 2017 1:42 pm

What I propose for January

Pokemon Club wrote: ↑

Sat Dec 23, 2017 1:42 pm

What I propose for January

team fl wrote: ↑

Mon Dec 25, 2017 11:14 am

Pokemon Club wrote: ↑

Sat Dec 23, 2017 1:42 pm

What I propose for January

So you repeatedly ignore the community again that worked and discussed the offseason calender. That means you either are too dumb which would mean you're an idiot or you actively ignored it which would make you an arrogant asshole. Either way, you consequently serve your reputation.

Idéfix wrote: ↑

Mon Dec 25, 2017 11:27 am

team fl wrote: ↑

Mon Dec 25, 2017 11:14 am

Pokemon Club wrote: ↑

Sat Dec 23, 2017 1:42 pm

What I propose for January

So you repeatedly ignore the community again that worked and discussed the offseason calender. That means you either are too dumb which would mean you're an idiot or you actively ignored it which would make you an arrogant asshole. Either way, you consequently serve your reputation.

Cool FL it's Christmas Day. Couldn't say the same thing in another way?

Gipfelstuermer wrote: ↑

Tue Dec 26, 2017 1:19 pm

Please, please, please minimize editions for tours. Make it 4 times per tour or even three if you have so many tours. Otherwise you will have a lot of boring races with less than 10 teams per race.

Pokemon Club wrote: ↑

Tue Dec 26, 2017 10:59 am

But you Donkey and FL I have nothing more to discuss with you. I don't do the job for you but for luques, So what you think about it I definitively don't care.

Robyklebt wrote: ↑

Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:03 am

Pokemon Club wrote: ↑

Tue Dec 26, 2017 10:59 am

But you Donkey and FL I have nothing more to discuss with you. I don't do the job for you but for luques, So what you think about it I definitively don't care.

You always post this "I don't care what you think" as it was something you were proud of. If you were really doing stuff for the game (or Luques as you put it) you'd care what everybody thinks and strive to get the best for the game. Point is, you clearly don't. It's a power trip for you.

Pokemon Club wrote: ↑

Wed Dec 27, 2017 1:16 am

Care about what everybody think ? Looks a nice concept. But I don't trust that since long time ago. In fact I even don't care what we have. 7 or 9 riders, 2 or 3 tours, 3 or 5 editions isn't a big deal. Problem for me is that all is fix way too late. Way too much endless discussions to have a decision take the last moment. Coro opened the thread for the numbers of riders since 2 months and nothing is definitively fix. It isn't that much difficult to decide "we change" or "we don"t change" but no, endless discussion. You want to care about what the people want ? Do a vote. If not let luques decide. Not that difficult. And it is like that for all the point. So the day when you don't waste 75% of your time in endless discussion to have hurry decision when it is already too late for that, maybe I'll change my opinion about caring about each person in the game think.

Coroncina2 wrote: ↑

Wed Dec 27, 2017 12:11 pm

Pokemon Club wrote: ↑

Wed Dec 27, 2017 1:16 am

Care about what everybody think ? Looks a nice concept. But I don't trust that since long time ago. In fact I even don't care what we have. 7 or 9 riders, 2 or 3 tours, 3 or 5 editions isn't a big deal. Problem for me is that all is fix way too late. Way too much endless discussions to have a decision take the last moment. Coro opened the thread for the numbers of riders since 2 months and nothing is definitively fix. It isn't that much difficult to decide "we change" or "we don"t change" but no, endless discussion. You want to care about what the people want ? Do a vote. If not let luques decide. Not that difficult. And it is like that for all the point. So the day when you don't waste 75% of your time in endless discussion to have hurry decision when it is already too late for that, maybe I'll change my opinion about caring about each person in the game think.

I think real problem of this game is that, without owner, is difficult to know who and how take decisions. Like this we can propose something and make long discussions but it is impossible to reach a conclusion. Without an official and transparent decision like how (vote or not vote) and who makes the final decision, it is obvious that anyone who fixes something can be accused of favoring himself as a player. It seems Rob has to make decisions about the calendar, but there is no message in forum from Lesossise. Correct me if I'm wrong. If so, after many time lost to propose and ask how he wanted to do the 2018 calendar could already have answered long ago, if he wanted to do something well done and shared with more players possible. So far he has only participated in the various discussions saying what was good and did not go well in the proposals of others without ever making the final decision, if it is up to him. Even saying that it will do everything by itself and at the last moment without listening to anyone could be an answer, at least we avoid unnecessary discussions.
However, this is also the umpteenth comment of a long discussion. In the end the facts are these: like the past season we are just a few days from the end of the month and nothing has been decided yet, although thanks to Poke over half of the calendar has already been drawn for days.

Robyklebt wrote: ↑

Thu Dec 28, 2017 12:11 am

It's December. So tension up, ok.
Integrate various ideas? Ignore the proposal by the enemy of discussion. Otherwise integrate all you want.
And maybe leave a short plan up here for 12-24 hours so we all have time to complain and improve the Luques idea (hopefully even Coroncina manages to be constructive instead of just complaining) Even if certain people might think "discussion" or "input by normal average users" is useless.