Re: June 2012
Posted: Fri Jun 01, 2012 11:18 pm
10 stages tours are difficult to be inserted in the calendar ... maybe next winter... but not sureVea Olio wrote:I'm making a new tour, the Gragnano - Bruxelles, 10 stages
RSF Cyclingfreaks
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/RSFForum/
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/RSFForum/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=2808
10 stages tours are difficult to be inserted in the calendar ... maybe next winter... but not sureVea Olio wrote:I'm making a new tour, the Gragnano - Bruxelles, 10 stages
I can remove one stagelesossies wrote:10 stages tours are difficult to be inserted in the calendar ... maybe next winter... but not sureVea Olio wrote:I'm making a new tour, the Gragnano - Bruxelles, 10 stages
Little tours with 2-5 stages no problem ...Vea Olio wrote:I can remove one stagelesossies wrote:10 stages tours are difficult to be inserted in the calendar ... maybe next winter... but not sureVea Olio wrote:I'm making a new tour, the Gragnano - Bruxelles, 10 stages
It was a spontan action at months´end. Maybe because yours was a c4f one.Woddeltown Team wrote:Mh Leso, why do you put in my Beauce-Tour?
Olmania did it first and in my opinion looks a bit better.
And why are Stage four and five halfstages?
Maybe you can change only the 1st stage and use mine ? Still a middle mountain stage, but with a more interesting end of race because of a good designlesossies wrote:It was a spontan action at months´end. Maybe because yours was a c4f one.Woddeltown Team wrote:Mh Leso, why do you put in my Beauce-Tour?
Olmania did it first and in my opinion looks a bit better.
And why are Stage four and five halfstages?
I had no opinion which one was better.
Halfstages were better for packing the whole tour in the calendar.
It could be difficult to change it too much, because some teams have planed their races.
Because then the design is shit. The short hills are "flat" with the automation stuff, I don't like it.Robyklebt wrote:Or why don't you just learn to put the coordinates in
WCCT means 260kmTeam Franconia wrote:19 rounds, distance: 201,4 km
Ahh, but putting the coordinates in doesn't mean you can't do it by hand. Which of course is 150 times better...olmania wrote:Because then the design is shit. The short hills are "flat" with the automation stuff, I don't like it.Robyklebt wrote:Or why don't you just learn to put the coordinates in
look here:http://www.rad-net.de/html/bdr/meisters ... er2012.pdflesossies wrote:National championship germany:
WCCT means 260kmTeam Franconia wrote:19 rounds, distance: 201,4 km
which one is correct ?
You can use the new editor on the old way and if you dont have all the coords, just add a start and end destination.olmania wrote:Because then the design is shit. The short hills are "flat" with the automation stuff, I don't like it.
Dauphine 24hclub nautico wrote:I say several times, like other players i have the chance to ride only late evening, due to my work, and will be nice if also I become he chance to ride a tour that is intresting for my team, like others players.
I don't understand while evening give the Tour du sud, and not Slovenja,should be not hard to plan an alternative tour for the late evening players, then 21 hours is not late enough.
"We have two similar flat tour and both at late evening, really bad plan!"
Mitterberg : 22% uphill and 31% downhill ! Seriously ? Screen or fake !Vea Olio wrote:
Austrian race on 24th of june
Cuba for exampleolmania wrote:Some CN are ... missing ? Don't forget to add it leso