![Image](http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/pngfiles/krasnodaranapa15.png?rand=1428154190)
06/04 Giro del Belvedere (1.2U UCI):
![Image](http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/pngfiles/belvedere15.png?rand=1428161314)
11/04 Trofeo Edil C (1.2U UCI):
![Image](http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/pngfiles/trofeoedilc15.png?rand=1428164725)
Moderators: systemmods, Calendarmods
It is a matter of strength after 230k race. While if you let them do an itt for only the mur or paterberg the best jumper will win.Pokemon Club wrote:
The same for you no ? Anyway, for me it is simple, hilly paves should be normally a question of "strengh" and not of "jump", in that case the hilly influence is clearly too much for Paterberg ( and for hilly paves in general), or we adapt it wrongly
A monument at 9h would be really great, I would ride it too at 9. More Monuments at 9 and I wouldnt miss so many of themteam fl wrote:Question, why is PR at 10h instead of 9h as presented in the monthly PDF preview? There are some reasons, I plead for 9h:
- I could race it.
- Lunch wouldn't be a problem on a Sunday
- It was presented at 9h in the monthly PDF preview, affecting the monthly planning of teams.
- I could race it.
- Have I already mentioned that I could race it?
- Those who don't want to get up for PR at 9h but would at 10h don't deserve to take part anyway!
- Well yes, maybe I will be able to race it at 10h, but only with a mind-blowing effort...
- Still, present the information in the PDF as you do it later in the calender, or the other way round. But try to be consistent.
Go for PR at 9h!
// to pais VascoRockstar Inc wrote:sure let's put 1.234.300 fantasy tours in the calender...be happy that you can ride this stupid le sarthe bullshit // to catalunya
Agree 100%. Race is going awfully fast.Robyklebt wrote:Mintact for PR really is too short. Mintact from 224? Should be at the latest 205, better from 193. (98 ok too of course)
it works nowteam fl wrote:second link seems not to work.
wonderful! Let's go for 14h then!lesossies wrote:it works nowteam fl wrote:second link seems not to work.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests