March 2011
Moderators: systemmods, Calendarmods
Re: March 2011
Will post the details in the other thread later.
ddv11a, for some reason ddv11 seems to be used.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
-
- Posts: 231
- Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 6:56 pm
- Contact:
Re: March 2011
GP E3 is created?
Re: March 2011
I´ll put the 2010 version online.caissed epargne wrote:GP E3 is created?
If the profil changes and anybody designs it I´ll update it.
Re: March 2011
I'm designing it. slowly.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: March 2011
Basically nothing of importance changed, kept the Nokereberg at 204
Details for the north see here
viewtopic.php?f=15&t=67&p=26688#p26688
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: March 2011
No ProblemRobyklebt wrote:I'm designing it. slowly.
The most important is that we have the most profils for the form setup.
The details can be adjusted time after time.
THX to all designers
Re: March 2011
Calendar previews online:
http://www.radsportfreaks.com/radsport/March_2011.pdf
http://www.radsportfreaks.com/radsport/April_2011.pdf
http://www.radsportfreaks.com/radsport/May_2011.pdf
and so on ...
http://www.radsportfreaks.com/radsport/March_2011.pdf
http://www.radsportfreaks.com/radsport/April_2011.pdf
http://www.radsportfreaks.com/radsport/May_2011.pdf
and so on ...
-
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:50 pm
- Contact:
Re: March 2011
Rabobank Dorpenomloop Rucphen 1.2. in Real Life Calender March 13th
Saved as "dorprup11"
Re: March 2011
There is this Handzame Classic at March 18, 1.1
Do we ride it, too? We used to skip it in the former years. Don't know why.
http://www.handzameclassic.be/
Do we ride it, too? We used to skip it in the former years. Don't know why.
http://www.handzameclassic.be/
-
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:50 pm
- Contact:
Re: March 2011
Trofeo ZSSDI 1.2. in Italy around Trieste on March 6th
Saved as "zssdi11"
-
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:50 pm
- Contact:
Re: March 2011
Would have loved to do 3 days de DePanne, but with all the Hellingen and Kasseien, I would like to leave this for a experienced designer, as I would likely mess it up.
I will instead go for the Tour de Normandie tommorow, it has pretty detailed etapes online, not sure if it makes sense to run it on it's scheduled dates, but Catalunya and Coppi et Bartali have no profiles online, but would love to do some designing on my free day tommorow, while I have a couple of fantasy races already drawn up, which I'll likely design this afternoon.
I will instead go for the Tour de Normandie tommorow, it has pretty detailed etapes online, not sure if it makes sense to run it on it's scheduled dates, but Catalunya and Coppi et Bartali have no profiles online, but would love to do some designing on my free day tommorow, while I have a couple of fantasy races already drawn up, which I'll likely design this afternoon.
Re: March 2011
Why not give De Panne a try?
See the Belgian classics thread for details on resources etc, for info on how the climbs were done last year, post stuff there, at least I will happily complain if I don't like something.
Leso:
Finally got around checking 2010 for PN/Tirreno
Both had 5 times, and 9 times we had ok groups, only PN 15h had a smaller group with only 9.
Details
TA 10h 17
PN 11h 15
TA 14h 17
PN 15h 9
TA 17h 15
PN 18h 20
TA 20h 28
PN 21h 25
TA 22h 22
PN 23h 13
So to me it seems that tours with longer mintact are more popular
Ok ok, more seriously. 8 of 10 editions with good participation, 1 weak, one neither good nor bad. (13 23h) Both of them PN, probably PN just wasn't as good or interesting looking as TA in 2010. This year IMO they look similar.
Cutting the 23h time IMO not a good idea though here. Weaker than 8 others, but could be because of the PN course. And stronger than 15h PN. No, don't cut afternoon PN, Zeter und Mordio Geschreie would follow. But keep the 23h slot.
Don't know if the numbers increased much since last year, but anyway, in february the 23h times for stage races had ok participation, so IMO should be ok. Not the risk of a 7-9 teams group.
Add 23h TA is my opinion. Ok, I'm late as usual, still, add it tomorrow if no time today.
Catalunya: Why always 14/15, 17/18? Why not 16+19 for once? When they get times for middle important stuff, they usually get ok groups
Edit: CI times than would need to be adapted. Don't see the point in 17-19 anyway. no the early evening gets 2? Normal evening 0, afternoon 0, late evening one? IF you want to keep 17, then 17-20-23. But get over your love for 17 anyway, it's not more popular than other times. Make Catalunya morning-16-19-21-23 and CI in the evening 22, then don't know.. being less important and Nebenprogramm 12-17-20-22 or something weird like that might be ok.
See the Belgian classics thread for details on resources etc, for info on how the climbs were done last year, post stuff there, at least I will happily complain if I don't like something.
Leso:
Finally got around checking 2010 for PN/Tirreno
Both had 5 times, and 9 times we had ok groups, only PN 15h had a smaller group with only 9.
Details
TA 10h 17
PN 11h 15
TA 14h 17
PN 15h 9
TA 17h 15
PN 18h 20
TA 20h 28
PN 21h 25
TA 22h 22
PN 23h 13
So to me it seems that tours with longer mintact are more popular
Ok ok, more seriously. 8 of 10 editions with good participation, 1 weak, one neither good nor bad. (13 23h) Both of them PN, probably PN just wasn't as good or interesting looking as TA in 2010. This year IMO they look similar.
Cutting the 23h time IMO not a good idea though here. Weaker than 8 others, but could be because of the PN course. And stronger than 15h PN. No, don't cut afternoon PN, Zeter und Mordio Geschreie would follow. But keep the 23h slot.
Don't know if the numbers increased much since last year, but anyway, in february the 23h times for stage races had ok participation, so IMO should be ok. Not the risk of a 7-9 teams group.
Add 23h TA is my opinion. Ok, I'm late as usual, still, add it tomorrow if no time today.
Catalunya: Why always 14/15, 17/18? Why not 16+19 for once? When they get times for middle important stuff, they usually get ok groups
Edit: CI times than would need to be adapted. Don't see the point in 17-19 anyway. no the early evening gets 2? Normal evening 0, afternoon 0, late evening one? IF you want to keep 17, then 17-20-23. But get over your love for 17 anyway, it's not more popular than other times. Make Catalunya morning-16-19-21-23 and CI in the evening 22, then don't know.. being less important and Nebenprogramm 12-17-20-22 or something weird like that might be ok.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: March 2011
http://www.tourdenormandiecycliste.fr/
=> We don't care I guess ?
What about Settimana Lombarda and La Panne which should start at the end of March ?
=> We don't care I guess ?
What about Settimana Lombarda and La Panne which should start at the end of March ?
Re: March 2011
Rohrheim said he wanted to do it..
I hope Leso this year will do the right thing and put it as D5-6 if Rohrheim does it.
I hope Leso this year will do the right thing and put it as D5-6 if Rohrheim does it.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
-
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:50 pm
- Contact:
Re: March 2011
Lombarda is moved to later in the year, will be in September this season.
I started drawing Normandie with T4B, I will do it, up to you, if you want to put it at that date, or save it for later.
I looked at the De Panne Profile, and the first Stage is really too difficult for me, with it's 18 Hellingen.
Would have liked to do Catalunya or Coppa et Bartali, but no profiles on yet.
I started drawing Normandie with T4B, I will do it, up to you, if you want to put it at that date, or save it for later.
I looked at the De Panne Profile, and the first Stage is really too difficult for me, with it's 18 Hellingen.
Would have liked to do Catalunya or Coppa et Bartali, but no profiles on yet.
Re: March 2011
Next point:
Sanremo, fix or not the way it is?
Still not completely happy with the version on.
And that's something that IMO needs to be discussed, what version is better? Ideally would have been decided before the season change, but kind of impossible now.
Important part 2
Capo Berta 4-4-5 or 2-5-6 or something else? After spending another hour or so looking for GPS tracks, not finding any recorded by GPS, but more others, to me it looks even more like 2-5-6 if not 1-6 6.
Possibilites I see.
4 4 5: Has to be wrong, the first or the last km has to be less
2 5 6: Probably comes close to reality. Would work
2 6 5: Probably even closer to reality. Problem that it would make it too hard for sprinters IMO, prefer 2-5-6
3-5-5: I suspect there is a 6, but would work too, at least if somebody wants to try he can drop sprinters, that aren't fighting yet, and if fighting let them fight 2 km.
2-5-5: 10 meters less, no problem, same as above
1-6-6: No, although my latest measurements actually came to something like that, but would give too big an advantage to mountain sprinters and classic sprinters
Problem is we don't really have reliable numbers, only 128 meters up in 2,5 km from RCS, tracks from mapping sites and google earth not very precise.
Poggio
5 4 2 3 or 4 4 3 3?
Or something else again?
4 4 3 3 correct if you go by the numbers from the bottom up. Problem is it simulates it rather badly since then NOTHING happens in the Poggio normally. While that's where the guys that were at the limit before are dropped in reality.
5 4 2 3: Simulates it better, although not perfectly either.. attacks best at the bottem, in reality it's near the top. Allows dropping riders, but well... it's the sprinters instead of going from 80 riders to 30 or less, it goes from 80 to 75... 5 sprinters dropped max, ok, plus their helpers that's 10 more lets sais 80-65. Not perfect either
5-4-2-4: Overdoing it, but then at least the chances of an attack at the last 4 increase. An attack that will not be succesful very likely. Then need to go one more down in the downhill.. -6 -6 instead of -6 -5.
Or try to take the numbers from the top? Hard to say, but then the last km would be a 4 if not a 5, the one before that a 2 or a 3..
Here really don't know, no real opinion, we'll never get it right here, but what's best?
Sanremo, fix or not the way it is?
Still not completely happy with the version on.
And that's something that IMO needs to be discussed, what version is better? Ideally would have been decided before the season change, but kind of impossible now.
Important part 2
Capo Berta 4-4-5 or 2-5-6 or something else? After spending another hour or so looking for GPS tracks, not finding any recorded by GPS, but more others, to me it looks even more like 2-5-6 if not 1-6 6.
Possibilites I see.
4 4 5: Has to be wrong, the first or the last km has to be less
2 5 6: Probably comes close to reality. Would work
2 6 5: Probably even closer to reality. Problem that it would make it too hard for sprinters IMO, prefer 2-5-6
3-5-5: I suspect there is a 6, but would work too, at least if somebody wants to try he can drop sprinters, that aren't fighting yet, and if fighting let them fight 2 km.
2-5-5: 10 meters less, no problem, same as above
1-6-6: No, although my latest measurements actually came to something like that, but would give too big an advantage to mountain sprinters and classic sprinters
Problem is we don't really have reliable numbers, only 128 meters up in 2,5 km from RCS, tracks from mapping sites and google earth not very precise.
Poggio
5 4 2 3 or 4 4 3 3?
Or something else again?
4 4 3 3 correct if you go by the numbers from the bottom up. Problem is it simulates it rather badly since then NOTHING happens in the Poggio normally. While that's where the guys that were at the limit before are dropped in reality.
5 4 2 3: Simulates it better, although not perfectly either.. attacks best at the bottem, in reality it's near the top. Allows dropping riders, but well... it's the sprinters instead of going from 80 riders to 30 or less, it goes from 80 to 75... 5 sprinters dropped max, ok, plus their helpers that's 10 more lets sais 80-65. Not perfect either
5-4-2-4: Overdoing it, but then at least the chances of an attack at the last 4 increase. An attack that will not be succesful very likely. Then need to go one more down in the downhill.. -6 -6 instead of -6 -5.
Or try to take the numbers from the top? Hard to say, but then the last km would be a 4 if not a 5, the one before that a 2 or a 3..
Here really don't know, no real opinion, we'll never get it right here, but what's best?
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: March 2011
Close to what happens in reality ? (if you know it perfectly, I dont.)
Qui sème le vent récolte le tempo...
-
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:50 pm
- Contact:
Re: March 2011
Tour de Normandie March 21st - March 27th , on March 23rd both Stage 3 and Stage 4 are contested,
up to you, if you want to put it at that date, and likely depending, if Copa et Bartoli has profiles until then, as well as Catalunya.
Probably a Div 4/5-6 Tour, or putting it one week earlier or later may work.
Stage 2 and 4 I classified as Middle Mountain, others flat, not sure about 5 and 7, also have some hills.
up to you, if you want to put it at that date, and likely depending, if Copa et Bartoli has profiles until then, as well as Catalunya.
Probably a Div 4/5-6 Tour, or putting it one week earlier or later may work.
Stage 2 and 4 I classified as Middle Mountain, others flat, not sure about 5 and 7, also have some hills.
Re: March 2011
The 1-day race for March 4 is missing
Re: March 2011
Done, details in the other thread.
Next Gent-Wevelgem
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Re: March 2011
GP harelbeke updated
4. March race online
THX
4. March race online
THX
Re: March 2011
Do you want a 10 day tour ? Morroco tour from 25 march to 3 April ?? interesting for the team which have not the possibilities for the classics ...
2024-01-30 Big Donkey Elaska 1 Good move, good reading of the race, just the sprint didn't work out. High quality racing.
Re: March 2011
ye ye ye (happy like this guys)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MkQ3Hpe9JM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MkQ3Hpe9JM
----------------------------------------------
Motorizzati Corse
We're back!
Motorizzati Corse
We're back!
-
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2011 3:50 pm
- Contact:
Re: March 2011
March 20th 1.2. La Roue Tourangelle saved as "tourang11"
and hell yes, they have so many cotes and sprints, all from the race Itineraire.
-
- Posts: 1909
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Norimberga
- Contact:
Re: March 2011
of course not...don't offer too much nonsense, unimportant races while "the big races" been on screenElaska wrote:Do you want a 10 day tour ? Morroco tour from 25 march to 3 April ?? interesting for the team which have not the possibilities for the classics ...
"I'm an old-school sprinter. I can't climb a mountain but if I am in front with 200 metres to go then there's nobody who can beat me.” Mark Cavendish, at the 2007 Eneco Tour
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest