cycling4freaks.com

So then the question is: is buying a 21 yo rider on the normal transfer market between 95 and 100% of his initial market prize a reduced purchased rider which will always have the initial prize as selling basis? There is also nothing in the manual under "Transfermarket" about "reduced purchased" ru...

Cisse ist für 1.3M als jugendfahrer gekauft worden, dann verkauft worden und von dir für 1.2M dann gekauft worden.

ist auch markiert als verbilligter kauf, allerdings kann ich natürlich seinen damaligen marktwert nicht überprüfen für wie viel verbilligt du ihn gekauft hast.

Hmm Gethin gold ist nicht angezeigt als reduced purchase

Name Gethin Gold
Status Active

komisch also das hier eine reduced purchase rechnung durchgeführt wird.

anders als Cisse von FL der ist als reduced purchase geführt und war dies nach transferhistorie auch.

Bergwerk opened a thread about the selling price of his riders in the German part of the forum: http://www.radsportfreaks.de/RSFForum/viewtopic.php?f=42&p=118952#p118952 Usually I would have thought that it's due to him not understanding the basics, but then I had a look a my own riders. And I foun...

Do we already have a designed Christmas tour? another tour between the 18th and 22nd sounds good to me, not parallel to pave de noeal on the 23rd would be better in my opinion especially because on weekends we have lower participation anyways. if we do a parallel tour maybe only 4 editions for Dolis...

i am also against contests.

because it takes up a lot of time to design tours and most of these tours then never will be ridden. we currently dont have super many designers and if we increase the contests the might not design much other races then.

there is a mistake in the tour Points Calculation. cat.3 Tourend https://i.ibb.co/svQXcgJ/Alter-Punkte-table.png cat. 5 Tourend https://i.ibb.co/4fDB8vM/Alte-Punkte-tabelle-base-points-cat-5.png in the old table you can see that the Points are for differen Categories are always BasePoints + 30*days ...

Question espacially for our Calender admins:

What kind of races, in which regions are currently needed the most?

Maybe regularly updating the list here so designers know what to design.

Soo Division Resized great very good. A bit strange for some teams the resizing process but still fine in my opinion. Will be back to normal in the next months i guess so everything good. relegation: 3-4-5-6-7 in Div 1-2-3-4-5 feels a bit low in numbers for me espacially we had 33% relegation from d...

So we ban downhill paves in designs again?

South East Asian Tour sponsored by SEAT https://flagdownload.com/wp-content/uploads/Flag_of_Association_of_Southeast_Asian_Nations-128x85.png https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/fc/SEAT_Logo_from_2017.svg/221px-SEAT_Logo_from_2017.svg.png The South East Asian Tour (SEAT) will tak...

Ok arguments I can follow. In fact I planned Namibia parallel to the Andes in my first draft. Not sue why I switched it. My proposal to resolve this would be: Jable-Al Farandis from 05.11. -> 04.11. swap the spots of Cornwall Jamaica and Tour of Namibia meaning: Tour of Namibia : 05.11.-09.11. Corn...

i know this is a thing happens rarely because it needs a very specific situation.

not sure if it was there forever but i knew this for a longer time already.

i like the idea of not having a tour for climbers parallel to andes: for a pretty flat tour i could offer Tour of Namibia: 7 riders http://cycling4freaks.com/radsport/Bilder/profiles/namibia01.png?0 http://cycling4freaks.com/radsport/Bilder/profiles/namibia02.png?0 http://cycling4freaks.com/radsport...

i realised it very late but for the NCS we again only have the random profiles? Not the real ones (last time for swiss we had the real profile) But there are no real races now, are there :?: ok if thats the reason to go back to the random onces I think it is random ones for most of the RSF NCs, if ...

flockmastoR wrote: ↑

Mon Oct 16, 2023 1:07 pm

Hansa wrote: ↑

Mon Oct 16, 2023 12:30 pm

i realised it very late but for the NCS we again only have the random profiles?

Not the real ones (last time for swiss we had the real profile)

But there are no real races now, are there

ok if thats the reason to go back to the random onces

i realised it very late but for the NCS we again only have the random profiles?

Not the real ones (last time for swiss we had the real profile)

Downhill pave seems more selective than pave with +1, +2 recently. Was wondering about it already at Paris-Tours where the 0** was not selective but the -1** was. Looks like a consequence of the downhill pave bugfix. Unfortunately, the code is very hard to understand in this area, so I don't want t...

What happens to this topic? how many nominations does a race need to get in how many to get out? is there a voting on what gets in and whats not? when will that happen? will nothing happen at all because not enough teams mentiones anything?

According to stevens yesterday. If you have a bid on a rider and you want to direct buy the same rider you get error: Only one affected row is allowed here. if you delete the bid first then direct buy, it works. I fixed a bug there, but it may have been a little different. Any "Buy Now" with multip...

According to stevens yesterday.

If you have a bid on a rider and you want to direct buy the same rider you get error: Only one affected row is allowed here.

if you delete the bid first then direct buy, it works.

assuming 40 riders is based on 10 teams that would mean 4 less riders with prize money for every team below that, but what does happen to the prize money of the riders? is it just cutting of the money from the last positions? thats the thing that needs more thought and a bit of math simply cutting ...

you just throw out money to the winning teams in big fields (they dont need it) because if you win in a big field you actually dont earn less money than winner of a small field. But it would go to rank 1-40, not only the winner. Or you mean prize money should be for more than 40 riders? Or rather x...

its like giving 1 out of 10 people 1M euros and then say nice on average everyone got 100K. thats not at all any solve of the problem But that's just the principle of any prize money in game? Otherwise what? Everyone gets the same regardless of the race result? no but doubling the money for the win...

If you want to beat up small fields with 500k Salary and make easy money while doing that, yes, leave everything as it is. its not about beating up small fields with a 500K team there also can be multiple teams with a 500K team in small groups. and youre current proposal doesnt change that you lose...