cycling4freaks.com

There seems to be an unannounced maintenance on the server. Once it's back, we can try to fix what happened until now, but not sure how the situation is like, as the DB is also not reachable

Narrenparty wrote: ↑

Mon Mar 11, 2024 7:35 am

Hello,

i got a question about the Team Classification.
If two teams are at the same time at the end of a tour, who will win the Classification?

for example bergwerk and me at Tirreno Adriatico 9h. Why did bergwerk win and not me?

I think it's random

lennylenny wrote: ↑

Sun Mar 31, 2024 2:07 pm

hmmm don't think we skipped months and had other twice
duped months.PNG

I saw that, will be automatically fixed tomorrow (Apr 1), happens when the day of month doesn't exist in those other months. But I'll provide a real fix later.

Done (if I got you correctly)

It's not a new bug, is it? Just an extreme case, just an extreme case of the known ones? I won't touch that old sprint code, unless there are really major (new) issues. Trying to understand it would just consume way too much time, which can be used to start over with all the background race calculat...

looks like a bug to me possible in rounding or sth? idk someone hast to check the code Someone checked the code and there actually was a bug. The auctions are correctly ended below 95% / 90%, but the bids were selected wrongly, there was no restriction of it being above 90% / 95%. Someone might hav...

... and fixed palmares stats as well

I won this race, but my classics wins number didn't go up. Is it a bug or does that only include cat5+ races? Thanks for the hint, with the big change from end of October (race calculation, detailed prizes etc) a small bug was still present, so cat 4 was not considered a classic. Fixed it now, will...

3 days until the final PDF, anymore feedback on the stage races? Very little so far, meaning most of you are happy with the preview? PN || TA: Bugatti would prefer 9 over 10 for Tirreno, so 9-19 then and PN 14-22. Catalunya: zizou would like a morning edition. So might stay at 4 editions. Maybe the...

I saw that before and thought it even makes sense. With "sprint", he still might be slower than the others just making tempo.

During the NCs, there were some discussions about them. As the chat is already forgotten, feel free to discuss these topics here. The bugs we had this time, I should have fixed by now.

1) This really should be in another thread. "home screen"... but do it here. Don't hide the editor (and forum) under "mehr". Make the icons on top in 2 rows. So everything is visible. Ok, log out hidden is good, on the old flash thing when I had a jumpy mouse every 2 weeks I logged out by mistake d...

As you might have seen, with 1.28.0 we added two new pieces of information for users: Acronym: a three-letter acronym for each user / team, which will be used wherever there's not enough space to put the full name and where an unambiguous name is not really needed. The current acronyms are generated...

I also prefer sorting by last name. And I like the feature that we can "follow" riders on the market. But if nobody buys the rider, you cant see the skills anymore. Would be nice to change that. Otherwise I need to do my 3735679 and 3567479 bids again... You can't see the skills any more because th...

Should be possible, it's just a lot of effort for two race days next year (WC and Olympics). A few times, I was starting to think about it, then forgot it again And I'll be on vacation during the Olympics, so no chance to fix anything for me at least.

Rockstar Inc wrote: ↑

Wed Dec 20, 2023 10:31 am

Agree with Lenny, for me it also seems that there was a training - only the summary is missing

fixed now in 1.27.1

rider development etc use the structured data from the training table. Whilst we are at it, a bug I found on the rider development. The Climbing Value at start seems to be wrong if a rider trained Climbing on his first training? For example, my rider Yotam Ottolenghi started with 71, but it's shown...

OK, now I get it ;) I removed the report as text (redundant data), but that's still the one that's shown, while rider development etc use the structured data from the training table. I'll add a report created from the training table. you want to take away our fun of copy pasting it to the forum??? ...

OK, now I get it I removed the report as text (redundant data), but that's still the one that's shown, while rider development etc use the structured data from the training table. I'll add a report created from the training table.

CrazyV wrote: ↑

Tue Dec 19, 2023 5:52 pm

Next protest - why do you decide at such short notice?!

Is it relevant for you? Did you want to ride at 3pm?

Back up, login to join the discussion what to do with the races

Spree triple attack was intentional? If yes, should be punishable? Harsh. Btw he has dropped his guy 3 kms later. Edit : i don't mind about Spree, just to say it. It's just to show how it's difficult to say which is consider as a team attack and how if punishable or not. In this specific case the p...

The interesting question would be, if the triple attack was intentional and not just caused by changing the mind too late, network issue, or sausage fingers. If it was intentional, it was a team attack with some benefit for the attacker.

OK, I found a way to also consider the riders with transfers, at least if there are transfer records. So the data quality might be a little lower there, but lots of training history could still be created.

As you might have noticed, a while ago the training history and development graph was introduced, but old trainings (before Nov 2013) were still missing. They are now added again with the following restrictions (mostly because the old training was something like a simple text file, no structured dat...